%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV014-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 10.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 19 unt; 3 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 9 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quest_5,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_5) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(axiom_43,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n0)
| fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_43) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n0),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)) != f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n1),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n0)
| fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206),n0),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206),n1) != fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n0)
| fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)) = f_SUB_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),n1) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
quest_4 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206),n0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(t_206)),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : HWV014-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/10.39 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/10.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/10.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/10.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/10.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/10.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/10.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/10.39 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:48:45 UTC 2026
% 0.12/10.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/10.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/10.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/10.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % new_bool_1 with pid 904191 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/10.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/10.47 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.47 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 904193 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/10.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/10.47 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.47 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/10.47
% 0.15/10.47 % Proof found!
% 0.15/10.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/10.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/10.47 % Parsed axioms : 138
% 0.15/10.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 111
% 0.15/10.47 % Initial clauses : 27
% 0.15/10.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.15/10.47 % Processed clauses : 110
% 0.15/10.47 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.15/10.47 % ...subsumed : 49
% 0.15/10.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 59
% 0.15/10.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.15/10.47 % Backward-rewritten : 8
% 0.15/10.47 % Generated clauses : 253
% 0.15/10.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 189
% 0.15/10.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.15/10.47 % Paramodulations : 234
% 0.15/10.47 % Factorizations : 18
% 0.15/10.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/10.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Total rewrite steps : 82
% 0.15/10.47 % ...of those cached : 56
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 43
% 0.15/10.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.15/10.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.15/10.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 104
% 0.15/10.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 344
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 16
% 0.15/10.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 209
% 0.15/10.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 168
% 0.15/10.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 46
% 0.15/10.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.15/10.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.15/10.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.15/10.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/10.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4569
% 0.15/10.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 529
% 0.15/10.47
% 0.15/10.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.47 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/10.47 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 0.15/10.47
% 0.15/10.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.47 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/10.47 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.15/10.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/10.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------