%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : HWV015-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:14:47 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.42s % Output : Refutation 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : HWV015-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 06:54:08 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.42 % 0.19/0.42 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.19/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.19/0.42 % SZS status Theorem % 0.19/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.42 SPASS derived 70 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 100 clauses. % 0.19/0.42 SPASS allocated 75827 KBytes. % 0.19/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.07 on the problem. % 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.19/0.42 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.19/0.42 % 0.19/0.42 % 0.19/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 10 : % 0.19/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.19/0.42 1[0:Inp] || -> gt(level(x_139),n0)*l. % 0.19/0.42 2[0:Inp] || -> p_Rd(x_139)*. % 0.19/0.42 3[0:Inp] || -> p_Wr(x_139)*. % 0.19/0.42 4[0:Inp] || p_Reset(x_139)* -> . % 0.19/0.42 5[0:Inp] || equal(level(plus(x_139,n1)),level(x_139))** -> . % 0.19/0.42 26[0:Inp] || -> equal(int_level(u),level(u))**. % 0.19/0.42 58[0:Inp] p_Wr(u) p_Rd(u) || gt(int_level(u),n0) -> p_Reset(u) equal(int_level(plus(u,n1)),int_level(u))**. % 0.19/0.42 135[0:Rew:26.0,58.4,26.0,58.4,26.0,58.2] p_Rd(u) p_Wr(u) || gt(level(u),n0) -> p_Reset(u) equal(level(plus(u,n1)),level(u))**. % 0.19/0.42 248[0:Res:1.0,135.2] p_Wr(x_139) p_Rd(x_139) || -> p_Reset(x_139) equal(level(plus(x_139,n1)),level(x_139))**. % 0.19/0.42 257[0:MRR:248.0,248.1,248.2,248.3,3.0,2.0,4.0,5.0] || -> . % 0.19/0.42 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.19/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : quest_1 quest_2 quest_3 quest_4 quest_5 axiom_21 axiom_53 % 0.19/0.42 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------