%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 9 unt; 6 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 2 equ; 31 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_51,axiom,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_51) ).
cnf(axiom_29,axiom,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_29) ).
cnf(axiom_34,axiom,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X1))
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_34) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
( p_Rd(t_139)
| gt(fifo_length,level(t_139)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
p_Wr(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_51]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X1))
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p_Rd(t_139)
| gt(fifo_length,level(t_139)) ),
quest_4 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p_Wr(t_139),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X1))
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( gt(fifo_length,int_level(t_139))
| p_Rd(t_139) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Rd(t_139),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X1))
| ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Wr(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_10]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
gt(fifo_length,int_level(t_139)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : HWV019-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:48:40 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % sh5l with pid 3494609 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3494618 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 94
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 89
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 89
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 319
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 150
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 165
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 16
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 756
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 567
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 744
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 8
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 251
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 227
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 143
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 121
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 325
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 1320
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1274
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 727
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 126
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 50
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 13531
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 198
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3960 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.020 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------