%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : HWV019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:14:50 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.44s % Output : Refutation 0.21s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.13 % Problem : HWV019-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 01:26:11 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.21/0.44 % 0.21/0.44 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.21/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.21/0.44 % SZS status Theorem % 0.21/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.21/0.44 SPASS derived 45 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 99 clauses. % 0.21/0.44 SPASS allocated 75796 KBytes. % 0.21/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.07 on the problem. % 0.21/0.44 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.21/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.21/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.21/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.21/0.44 0:00:00.01 for the reduction. % 0.21/0.44 % 0.21/0.44 % 0.21/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 15 : % 0.21/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.21/0.44 1[0:Inp] || -> p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))*. % 0.21/0.44 2[0:Inp] || -> p_Wr(t_139)*. % 0.21/0.44 4[0:Inp] || -> gt(fifo_length,level(t_139))*r p_Rd(t_139). % 0.21/0.44 25[0:Inp] || -> equal(int_level(u),level(u))**. % 0.21/0.44 33[0:Inp] p_Reset(u) || p_Wr_error(plus(u,n1))* -> . % 0.21/0.44 38[0:Inp] p_Wr(u) || gt(fifo_length,int_level(u)) p_Wr_error(plus(u,n1))* -> p_Reset(u) p_Rd(u). % 0.21/0.44 55[0:Inp] p_Wr(u) p_Rd(u) || p_Wr_error(plus(u,n1))* -> p_Reset(u). % 0.21/0.44 103[0:MRR:55.3,33.0] p_Rd(u) p_Wr(u) || p_Wr_error(plus(u,n1))* -> . % 0.21/0.44 116[0:Rew:25.0,38.1] p_Wr(u) || gt(fifo_length,level(u)) p_Wr_error(plus(u,n1))* -> p_Reset(u) p_Rd(u). % 0.21/0.44 117[0:MRR:116.3,116.4,33.0,103.1] p_Wr(u) || p_Wr_error(plus(u,n1))* gt(fifo_length,level(u)) -> . % 0.21/0.44 217[0:Res:1.0,117.2] p_Wr(t_139) || gt(fifo_length,level(t_139))*r -> . % 0.21/0.44 218[0:Res:1.0,103.2] p_Wr(t_139) p_Rd(t_139) || -> . % 0.21/0.44 222[0:MRR:218.0,2.0] p_Rd(t_139) || -> . % 0.21/0.44 223[0:MRR:4.1,222.0] || -> gt(fifo_length,level(t_139))*r. % 0.21/0.44 227[0:MRR:217.0,217.1,2.0,223.0] || -> . % 0.21/0.44 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.21/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : quest_1 quest_2 quest_4 axiom_21 axiom_29 axiom_34 axiom_51 % 0.21/0.44 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------