%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : HWV024-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:40:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.94s 1.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 97 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 100 ( 36 ~; 64 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 0 sgn 37 !; 0 ?; 27 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f42,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ p_Data_out(X1,plus(X0,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_32) ).
fof(f61,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( p_Data_out(X1,X0)
| ~ p_Data_out(X1,plus(X0,n1))
| p_Rd(X0)
| ~ p_Wr(X0)
| p_Reset(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_47) ).
fof(f62,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ p_Data_out(X1,X0)
| p_Data_out(X1,plus(X0,n1))
| p_Rd(X0)
| ~ p_Wr(X0)
| p_Reset(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_48) ).
fof(f105,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( p_Data_out(X1,X0)
| ~ p_Data_out(X1,plus(X0,n1))
| p_Rd(X0)
| p_Wr(X0)
| p_Reset(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_83) ).
fof(f106,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ p_Data_out(X1,X0)
| p_Data_out(X1,plus(X0,n1))
| p_Rd(X0)
| p_Wr(X0)
| p_Reset(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_84) ).
fof(f113,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Rd(x_140),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
fof(f114,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_140),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
fof(f115,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1))
| ~ p_Data_out(x_139,x_140) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
fof(f116,negated_conjecture,
( p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1))
| p_Data_out(x_139,x_140) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
tcf(c_173,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).
tcf(c_188,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,X1)
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).
tcf(c_189,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Wr(X1)
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).
tcf(c_224,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,X1)
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f105]) ).
tcf(c_225,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Wr(X1)
| p_Reset(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).
tcf(c_232,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Rd(x_140),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f113]) ).
tcf(c_233,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_140),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f114]) ).
tcf(c_234,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p_Data_out(x_139,x_140)
| ~ p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).
tcf(c_235,negated_conjecture,
( p_Data_out(x_139,x_140)
| p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).
tcf(c_339,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ p_Data_out(X0,X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1))
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Reset(X1) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_225,c_225,c_189]) ).
tcf(c_340,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,X1) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_339]) ).
tcf(c_342,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,X1)
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1)) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_224,c_173,c_224,c_188]) ).
tcf(c_352,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1))
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,X1) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_189,c_340]) ).
tcf(c_354,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1))
| p_Data_out(X0,X1)
| p_Rd(X1) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_188,c_342]) ).
tcf(c_355,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Rd(X1)
| p_Data_out(X0,X1)
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,plus(X1,n1)) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_354]) ).
tcf(c_438,plain,
( p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1))
| p_Data_out(x_139,x_140) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_235]) ).
tcf(c_439,plain,
( p_Data_out(x_139,x_140)
| p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1)) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_438]) ).
tcf(c_3806,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( p_Rd(X0)
| p_Data_out(X1,plus(X0,n1))
| ~ p_Data_out(X1,X0)
| ( X0 != x_140 ) ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_233,c_352]) ).
tcf(c_3807,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( p_Rd(x_140)
| p_Data_out(X0,plus(x_140,n1))
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,x_140) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_3806]) ).
tcf(c_3809,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ p_Data_out(X0,x_140)
| p_Data_out(X0,plus(x_140,n1)) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_3807,c_232,c_3807]) ).
tcf(c_3810,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( p_Data_out(X0,plus(x_140,n1))
| ~ p_Data_out(X0,x_140) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_3809]) ).
tcf(c_5240,plain,
p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1)),
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_439,c_3810]) ).
tcf(c_9830,plain,
( p_Rd(x_140)
| p_Data_out(x_139,x_140)
| ~ p_Data_out(x_139,plus(x_140,n1)) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_355]) ).
tcf(c_9832,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_9830,c_5240,c_234,c_232]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV024-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 16:30:24 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.41
% 0.09/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.41
% 0.09/0.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.43 % Proving...
% 0.94/1.28 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ iProver source info
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.94/1.28 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.94/1.28 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e %
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Problem Properties
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 %
% 0.94/1.28 % clauses 67
% 0.94/1.28 % conjectures 2
% 0.94/1.28 % EPR 9
% 0.94/1.28 % Horn 26
% 0.94/1.28 % unary 9
% 0.94/1.28 % binary 16
% 0.94/1.28 % lits 203
% 0.94/1.28 % lits eq 34
% 0.94/1.28 % fd_pure 0
% 0.94/1.28 % fd_pseudo 0
% 0.94/1.28 % fd_cond 1
% 0.94/1.28 % fd_pseudo_cond 6
% 0.94/1.28 % AC symbols 0
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------
% 0.94/1.28 % Current options:
% 0.94/1.28 % ------
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 %
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % ------ Proving...
% 0.94/1.28 %
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.28
% 0.94/1.28
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------