%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV025-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 9 unt; 8 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_53,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_53) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_27,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_27) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1)) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206)),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : HWV025-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:49:38 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % new_bool_3 with pid 3587551 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.46 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3587560 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.46 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.46
% 0.10/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.46 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 137
% 0.10/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 103
% 0.10/0.46 % Initial clauses : 34
% 0.10/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 0.10/0.46 % Processed clauses : 176
% 0.10/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.10/0.46 % ...subsumed : 94
% 0.10/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 81
% 0.10/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.10/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.10/0.46 % Generated clauses : 617
% 0.10/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 412
% 0.10/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 0.10/0.46 % Paramodulations : 574
% 0.10/0.46 % Factorizations : 42
% 0.10/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.10/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 233
% 0.10/0.46 % ...of those cached : 196
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 68
% 0.10/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.10/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.10/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 54
% 0.10/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 247
% 0.10/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 1076
% 0.10/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.10/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 574
% 0.10/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 434
% 0.10/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 101
% 0.10/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.10/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.10/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.10/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9643
% 0.10/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 509
% 0.10/0.46
% 0.10/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.46 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.10/0.46 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.46 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.10/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 0.10/0.46
% 0.10/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.46 % User time : 0.017 s
% 0.10/0.46 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.46 % Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.10/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------