%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV026-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 9 unt; 4 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_56,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_56) ).
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_13) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(X1)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(t_206)),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV026-3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:48:21 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.35 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.39 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % new_bool_3 with pid 3389072 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.42 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3389075 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.42 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.42 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 137
% 0.14/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 104
% 0.14/0.42 % Initial clauses : 33
% 0.14/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.14/0.42 % Processed clauses : 154
% 0.14/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.14/0.42 % ...subsumed : 78
% 0.14/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 75
% 0.14/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.14/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.14/0.42 % Generated clauses : 570
% 0.14/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 372
% 0.14/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.14/0.42 % Paramodulations : 527
% 0.14/0.42 % Factorizations : 42
% 0.14/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.14/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 229
% 0.14/0.42 % ...of those cached : 193
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 65
% 0.14/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.14/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.14/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 52
% 0.14/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 229
% 0.14/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 1015
% 0.14/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.14/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 478
% 0.14/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 367
% 0.14/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 79
% 0.14/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.14/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.14/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.14/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8918
% 0.14/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 508
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.42 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.42 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 0.14/0.42
% 0.14/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.42 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.42 % Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.14/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------