%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV028-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:25 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 14 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 31 ( 5 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
( ~ gt(X2,X3)
| ~ gt(X1,X2)
| gt(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_13) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(plus(t_139,n1)),fifo_length),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(axiom_26,axiom,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_26) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
gt(fifo_length,n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
p_Reset(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_17,axiom,
~ gt(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_17) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ gt(X2,X3)
| ~ gt(X1,X2)
| gt(X1,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(plus(t_139,n1)),fifo_length),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ gt(X2,X3)
| ~ gt(X1,X2)
| gt(X1,X3) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
gt(fifo_length,n0),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
gt(int_level(plus(t_139,n1)),fifo_length),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = n0 ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p_Reset(t_139),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
~ gt(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ gt(X1,fifo_length)
| gt(X1,n0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
gt(n0,fifo_length),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
~ gt(X1,X1),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : HWV028-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.43 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:49:18 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.53 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % sh5l with pid 1748954 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.53 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.53 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1748955 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.26/0.53 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.26/0.53 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 93
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses : 88
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 0.26/0.53 % Processed clauses : 35
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.26/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Generated clauses : 28
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 22
% 0.26/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Paramodulations : 25
% 0.26/0.53 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.26/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 74
% 0.26/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 347
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.26/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.26/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4362
% 0.26/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 196
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 3704 pages
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------