%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : HWV028-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:14:56 EDT 2022 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.42s % Output : Refutation 0.17s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : HWV028-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.13/0.32 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.32 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.32 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.32 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 07:14:19 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.32 % CPUTime : % 0.17/0.42 % 0.17/0.42 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.17/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.17/0.42 % SZS status Theorem % 0.17/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.17/0.42 SPASS derived 66 clauses, backtracked 26 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 167 clauses. % 0.17/0.42 SPASS allocated 75801 KBytes. % 0.17/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem. % 0.17/0.42 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 0.17/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.17/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.17/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.17/0.42 0:00:00.02 for the reduction. % 0.17/0.42 % 0.17/0.42 % 0.17/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 12 : % 0.17/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.17/0.42 1[0:Inp] || -> p_Reset(t_139)*. % 0.17/0.42 2[0:Inp] || -> gt(level(plus(t_139,n1)),fifo_length)*l. % 0.17/0.42 3[0:Inp] || -> gt(fifo_length,n0)*r. % 0.17/0.42 16[0:Inp] || gt(u,v)* gt(v,w)* -> gt(u,w)*. % 0.17/0.42 20[0:Inp] || gt(u,u)* -> . % 0.17/0.42 24[0:Inp] || -> equal(int_level(u),level(u))**. % 0.17/0.42 29[0:Inp] p_Reset(u) || -> equal(int_level(plus(u,n1)),n0)**. % 0.17/0.42 98[0:Rew:24.0,29.1] p_Reset(u) || -> equal(level(plus(u,n1)),n0)**. % 0.17/0.42 177[0:Res:1.0,98.0] || -> equal(level(plus(t_139,n1)),n0)**. % 0.17/0.42 190[0:Rew:177.0,2.0] || -> gt(n0,fifo_length)*l. % 0.17/0.42 255[0:OCh:16.1,16.0,190.0,3.0] || -> gt(fifo_length,fifo_length)*. % 0.17/0.42 256[0:MRR:255.0,20.0] || -> . % 0.17/0.42 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.17/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : quest_1 quest_2 quest_3 axiom_13 axiom_17 axiom_21 axiom_26 % 0.17/0.42 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------