%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV034-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:26 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_21ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_42ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n2,X1),n1)
| value(in(n1,X1),n1) ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( ~ value(in(n2,X1),n1)
| ~ value(in(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(out(n1,X1),n1) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( ~ value(in(n2,X1),n0)
| ~ value(in(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(out(n1,X1),n0) ),
c_0_23,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n2,X1),n0)
| value(in(n1,X1),n0) ),
c_0_24,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( ~ value(in(X2,X1),n1)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(out(n1,X1),n1) ),
c_0_25,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( ~ value(in(X2,X1),n0)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(out(n1,X1),n0) ),
c_0_26,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
( ~ value(in(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(out(n1,X1),n1) ),
c_0_27,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( ~ value(in(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(out(n1,X1),n0) ),
c_0_28,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n2,X1),n1) ),
c_0_29,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n2,X1),n0) ),
c_0_30,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n1,X1),n1) ),
c_0_31,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ type(X1,and)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n1,X1),n1) ),
c_0_32,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_54,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n1)
| ~ type(X1,not)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n1,X1),n0) ),
c_0_33,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ~ value(out(n1,X1),n0)
| ~ type(X1,or)
| ~ mode(X1,ok)
| value(in(n1,X1),n0) ),
c_0_34,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ type(X1,X2)
| mode(X1,abnormal)
| mode(X1,ok) ),
c_0_35,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ value(X1,X3)
| ~ value(X1,X2)
| equal_value(X2,X3) ),
c_0_36,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ value(X2,X3)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| value(X1,X3) ),
c_0_37,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ value(X1,X3)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| value(X2,X3) ),
c_0_38,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ mode(X1,abnormal)
| ~ mode(X1,ok) ),
c_0_39,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
~ equal_value(n1,n0),
c_0_40,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
~ equal_value(n0,n1),
c_0_41,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV034-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:51:28 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 175382 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 175391 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.44 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.44 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 21
% 0.14/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Initial clauses : 21
% 0.14/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 21
% 0.14/0.44 % Processed clauses : 42
% 0.14/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 42
% 0.14/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.14/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 21
% 0.14/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 258
% 0.14/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 84
% 0.14/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.14/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1836
% 0.14/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 76
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.44 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3396 pages
% 0.14/0.44
% 0.14/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44 % User time : 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.44 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Total time : 0.034 s
% 0.14/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------