%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV034-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:47:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.26s 0.62s
% Output : Saturation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_27ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_57ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ one(X1)
| ~ zero(X1) ),
c_0_27,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ one(out1(X1))
| ~ or_ok(X1)
| one(in2(X1))
| one(in1(X1)) ),
c_0_28,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( ~ one(out1(X1))
| ~ and_ok(X1)
| one(in2(X1)) ),
c_0_29,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
( ~ zero(in2(X1))
| ~ one(out1(X1))
| ~ or_ok(X1)
| one(in1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ one(in2(X1))
| ~ one(in1(X1))
| ~ and_ok(X1)
| one(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_32,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ zero(in2(X1))
| ~ zero(in1(X1))
| ~ or_ok(X1)
| zero(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_33,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ zero(out1(X1))
| ~ and_ok(X1)
| zero(in2(X1))
| zero(in1(X1)) ),
c_0_34,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( ~ zero(in2(X1))
| ~ one(out1(X1))
| ~ and_ok(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_35]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( ~ zero(in1(X1))
| ~ not_ok(X1)
| one(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_36,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ one(in2(X1))
| ~ or_ok(X1)
| one(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_37,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( ~ one(in1(X1))
| ~ or_ok(X1)
| one(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_38,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( ~ zero(out1(X1))
| ~ not_ok(X1)
| one(in1(X1)) ),
c_0_39,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ one(out1(X1))
| ~ and_ok(X1)
| one(in1(X1)) ),
c_0_40,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( ~ zero(out1(X1))
| ~ or_ok(X1)
| zero(in2(X1)) ),
c_0_41,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_68,plain,
( ~ one(in1(X1))
| ~ not_ok(X1)
| zero(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_42,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( ~ zero(in2(X1))
| ~ and_ok(X1)
| zero(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_43,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( ~ zero(in1(X1))
| ~ and_ok(X1)
| zero(out1(X1)) ),
c_0_44,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( ~ one(out1(X1))
| ~ not_ok(X1)
| zero(in1(X1)) ),
c_0_45,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( ~ zero(out1(X1))
| ~ or_ok(X1)
| zero(in1(X1)) ),
c_0_46,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( ~ one(X2)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| one(X1) ),
c_0_47,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
( ~ one(X1)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| one(X2) ),
c_0_48,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( ~ zero(X2)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| zero(X1) ),
c_0_49,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_76,plain,
( ~ zero(X1)
| ~ connection(X1,X2)
| zero(X2) ),
c_0_50,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( ~ logic_not(X1)
| abnormal(X1)
| not_ok(X1) ),
c_0_51,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( ~ logic_or(X1)
| abnormal(X1)
| or_ok(X1) ),
c_0_52,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_79,plain,
( ~ logic_and(X1)
| abnormal(X1)
| and_ok(X1) ),
c_0_53,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( ~ abnormal(X1)
| ~ not_ok(X1) ),
c_0_54,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
( ~ abnormal(X1)
| ~ or_ok(X1) ),
c_0_55,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( ~ abnormal(X1)
| ~ and_ok(X1) ),
c_0_56,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : HWV034-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.45 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.45 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 20:54:59 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.54 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1399078 completed with status 1
% 0.26/0.62 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.26/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.62 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.62 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting G-E--_107_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S4S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C02CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1399082 completed with status 1
% 0.26/0.62 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.62 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.62 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.62
% 0.26/0.62 % No proof found!
% 0.26/0.62 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.26/0.62 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 27
% 0.26/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Initial clauses : 27
% 0.26/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 27
% 0.26/0.62 % Processed clauses : 33
% 0.26/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % ...subsumed : 4
% 0.26/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 29
% 0.26/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Generated clauses : 14
% 0.26/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
% 0.26/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Paramodulations : 14
% 0.26/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 29
% 0.26/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 29
% 0.26/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 179
% 0.26/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 145
% 0.26/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.26/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1412
% 0.26/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 69
% 0.26/0.62
% 0.26/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.62 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.26/0.62 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.62 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.26/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 3652 pages
% 0.26/0.62
% 0.26/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.62 % User time : 0.023 s
% 0.26/0.62 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.26/0.62 % Total time : 0.037 s
% 0.26/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------