↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : HWV052-1.001.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   27 (  18 unt;   9 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (  36 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(bit_inverse,axiom,
    inv(X1) != X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',bit_inverse) ).

cnf(bit_domain,axiom,
    ( X1 = i
    | X1 = o ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',bit_domain) ).

cnf(unpack1_01,axiom,
    unpack1(inv(X1),pack1(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unpack1_01) ).

cnf(unpack1,axiom,
    unpack1(X1,pack1(X1)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unpack1) ).

cnf(unpack1_02,axiom,
    unpack1(X1,inv(pack1(X1))) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unpack1_02) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    inv(X1) != X1,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[bit_inverse]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    inv(X1) != X1,
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    ( X1 = i
    | X1 = o ),
    bit_domain ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    unpack1(inv(X1),pack1(X1)) = X1,
    unpack1_01 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    inv(i) = o,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    unpack1(X1,pack1(X1)) = X1,
    unpack1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    unpack1(o,pack1(i)) = i,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( X2 = X1
    | X2 = o
    | X1 = o ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( pack1(X1) = o
    | unpack1(X1,i) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( pack1(i) = o
    | unpack1(o,i) = i ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    i != o,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 = o
    | inv(o) = X1 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    unpack1(X1,inv(pack1(X1))) = X1,
    unpack1_02 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( pack1(o) = o
    | pack1(i) = o ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    inv(o) = i,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]),c_0_11]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( pack1(X1) = o
    | unpack1(X1,o) = X1 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_7]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( pack1(o) = o
    | unpack1(o,o) = i ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_18]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    unpack1(i,pack1(o)) = o,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    pack1(o) = o,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    unpack1(i,o) = o,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    pack1(i) = o,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_24]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_25]),c_0_24]),c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : HWV052-1.001.001 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:06:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 189594 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.43  % Search class: FGUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % partial match(1): FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting U----_206c_00_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting U----_206d_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 189599 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.43  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.43  % Search class: FGUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % partial match(1): FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.10/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.10/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.10/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 80
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 49
% 0.10/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 31
% 0.10/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.10/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 10
% 0.10/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 347
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 280
% 0.10/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 313
% 0.10/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 28
% 0.10/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 6
% 0.10/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 61
% 0.10/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 50
% 0.10/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.10/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.10/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.10/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 11
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 195
% 0.10/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 611
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.10/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 136
% 0.10/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 127
% 0.10/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 47
% 0.10/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.10/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.10/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1565
% 0.10/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.10/0.43  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.10/0.43  
% 0.10/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43  % User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.10/0.43  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Total time               : 0.025 s
% 0.10/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.10/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------