↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : HWV069-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.5.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:24 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 36.27s 33.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 36.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   50 (  11 unt;   6 nHn;  50 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  131 (   0 equ;  81 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   17 (  16 usr;   3 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  168 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_3018,axiom,
    ( ~ esk7953_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7951_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7952_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_3018) ).

cnf(i_0_3978,axiom,
    ( ~ esk7826_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7824_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7825_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_3978) ).

cnf(i_0_8559,axiom,
    ( ~ esk7824_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7953_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_8559) ).

cnf(i_0_27269,axiom,
    ( ~ esk8761_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8120_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_27269) ).

cnf(i_0_18074,axiom,
    ( ~ esk9108_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7937_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_18074) ).

cnf(i_0_6826,axiom,
    ( ~ esk8752_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk9168_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_6826) ).

cnf(i_0_17201,axiom,
    ( ~ esk7825_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8761_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_17201) ).

cnf(i_0_1548,axiom,
    ( ~ esk8751_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7826_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_1548) ).

cnf(i_0_902,axiom,
    ( ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk7937_4(X3,X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_902) ).

cnf(i_0_16826,axiom,
    ( ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk9168_4(X4,X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk1_0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_16826) ).

cnf(i_0_14639,axiom,
    ( ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk2_0
    | ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk8751_4(X1,X3,X4,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_14639) ).

cnf(i_0_26419,axiom,
    ( ~ esk7952_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk9108_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_26419) ).

cnf(i_0_15706,axiom,
    ( ~ esk7951_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8752_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_15706) ).

cnf(i_0_18461,axiom,
    ~ esk8120_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_18461) ).

cnf(i_0_15881,axiom,
    ~ esk1_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_15881) ).

cnf(rule_true,axiom,
    p(true),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule_true) ).

cnf(i_0_25550,axiom,
    esk2_0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i_0_25550) ).

cnf(c_0_27287,plain,
    ( ~ esk7953_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7951_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7952_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_3018]) ).

cnf(c_0_27288,plain,
    ( ~ esk7826_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7824_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7825_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_3978]) ).

cnf(c_0_27289,plain,
    ( ~ esk7824_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7953_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_8559]) ).

cnf(c_0_27290,plain,
    ( ~ esk8761_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8120_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_27269]) ).

cnf(c_0_27291,plain,
    ( ~ esk9108_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7937_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_18074]) ).

cnf(c_0_27292,plain,
    ( ~ esk8752_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk9168_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_6826]) ).

cnf(c_0_27293,plain,
    ( ~ esk7825_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8761_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_17201]) ).

cnf(c_0_27294,plain,
    ( ~ esk8751_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7826_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_1548]) ).

cnf(c_0_27295,plain,
    ( ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk7937_4(X3,X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk1_0 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_902]) ).

cnf(c_0_27296,plain,
    ( ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk9168_4(X4,X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk1_0 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_16826]) ).

cnf(c_0_27297,plain,
    ( ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk2_0
    | ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk8751_4(X1,X3,X4,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_14639]) ).

cnf(c_0_27298,plain,
    ( ~ esk7952_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk9108_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_26419]) ).

cnf(c_0_27299,plain,
    ( ~ esk7951_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8752_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_15706]) ).

cnf(c_0_27300,plain,
    ~ esk8120_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_18461]) ).

cnf(c_0_27301,plain,
    ~ esk1_0,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[i_0_15881]) ).

cnf(c_0_27302,plain,
    ( ~ esk7953_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7951_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7952_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27287 ).

cnf(c_0_27303,plain,
    ( ~ esk7826_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7824_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7825_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27288 ).

cnf(c_0_27304,plain,
    ( ~ esk7824_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7953_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27289 ).

cnf(c_0_27305,plain,
    ( ~ esk8761_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8120_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27290 ).

cnf(c_0_27306,plain,
    ( ~ esk9108_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7937_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27291 ).

cnf(c_0_27307,plain,
    ( ~ esk8752_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk9168_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27292 ).

cnf(c_0_27308,plain,
    ( ~ esk7825_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8761_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27293 ).

cnf(c_0_27309,plain,
    ( ~ esk8751_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk7826_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27294 ).

cnf(c_0_27310,plain,
    ( ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk7937_4(X3,X4,X2,X1)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk1_0 ),
    c_0_27295 ).

cnf(c_0_27311,plain,
    ( ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk9168_4(X4,X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk1_0 ),
    c_0_27296 ).

cnf(c_0_27312,plain,
    ( ~ p(X4)
    | ~ esk2_0
    | ~ p(X3)
    | ~ p(X2)
    | ~ p(X1)
    | esk8751_4(X1,X3,X4,X2) ),
    c_0_27297 ).

cnf(c_0_27313,plain,
    ( ~ esk7952_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk9108_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27298 ).

cnf(c_0_27314,plain,
    ( ~ esk7951_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | esk8752_4(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    c_0_27299 ).

cnf(c_0_27315,plain,
    ~ esk8120_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),
    c_0_27300 ).

cnf(c_0_27316,plain,
    ~ esk1_0,
    c_0_27301 ).

cnf(c_0_27317,axiom,
    p(true),
    rule_true ).

cnf(c_0_27318,axiom,
    esk2_0,
    i_0_25550 ).

cnf(c_0_27319,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_27302,c_0_27303,c_0_27304,c_0_27305,c_0_27306,c_0_27307,c_0_27308,c_0_27309,c_0_27310,c_0_27311,c_0_27312,c_0_27313,c_0_27314,c_0_27315,c_0_27316,c_0_27317,c_0_27318]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : HWV069-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.5.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.39  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:10:28 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 36.27/33.52  % Version: 3.5.1
% 36.27/33.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLLLSSSSSNFFN.
% 36.27/33.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 300s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % new_bool_3 with pid 1258470 completed with status 9
% 36.27/33.52  % new_bool_1 with pid 1258471 completed with status 9
% 36.27/33.52  % sh5l with pid 1258472 completed with status 9
% 36.27/33.52  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1258473 completed with status 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 36.27/33.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLLLSSSSSNFFN.
% 36.27/33.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 300s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 36.27/33.52  % No SInE strategy applied
% 36.27/33.52  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLF00-SFFFFFNN
% 36.27/33.52  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1258512 completed with status 8
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 129s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1258515 completed with status 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 36.27/33.52  % Preprocessing class: FMLLLLSSSSSNFFN.
% 36.27/33.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 900s (3) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 900s (3) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 300s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 36.27/33.52  % No SInE strategy applied
% 36.27/33.52  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLF00-SFFFFFNN
% 36.27/33.52  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1258512 completed with status 8
% 36.27/33.52  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 129s (1) cores
% 36.27/33.52  % Preprocessing time       : 0.181 s
% 36.27/33.52  % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 36.27/33.52  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 36.27/33.52  
% 36.27/33.52  % Proof found!
% 36.27/33.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 36.27/33.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 36.27/33.52  % Parsed axioms                        : 27749
% 36.27/33.52  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Initial clauses                      : 27749
% 36.27/33.52  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 27749
% 36.27/33.52  % Processed clauses                    : 5625
% 36.27/33.52  % ...of these trivial                  : 523
% 36.27/33.52  % ...subsumed                          : 102
% 36.27/33.52  % ...remaining for further processing  : 5000
% 36.27/33.52  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 36.27/33.52  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % NegExts                              : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Total rewrite steps                  : 535
% 36.27/33.52  % ...of those cached                   : 522
% 36.27/33.52  % Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional clauses             : 27115
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 27113
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 17
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.031
% 36.27/33.52  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.007
% 36.27/33.52  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 36.27/33.52  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.031
% 36.27/33.52  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.007
% 36.27/33.52  % Current number of processed clauses  : 4991
% 36.27/33.52  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
% 36.27/33.52  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 36.27/33.52  %    Negative unit clauses             : 33
% 36.27/33.52  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4937
% 36.27/33.52  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22124
% 36.27/33.52  % ...number of literals in the above   : 71376
% 36.27/33.52  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 36.27/33.52  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6127967
% 36.27/33.52  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3607925
% 36.27/33.52  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29749
% 36.27/33.52  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 36.27/33.52  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 36.27/33.52  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 36.27/33.52  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 917197
% 36.27/33.52  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 53155
% 36.27/33.52  
% 36.27/33.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 36.27/33.52  % User time                : 32.305 s
% 36.27/33.52  % System time              : 0.184 s
% 36.27/33.52  % Total time               : 32.490 s
% 36.27/33.52  % Maximum resident set size: 58288 pages
% 36.27/33.52  
% 36.27/33.52  % -------------------------------------------------
% 36.27/33.52  % User time                : 35.253 s
% 36.27/33.52  % System time              : 0.875 s
% 36.27/33.52  % Total time               : 36.129 s
% 36.27/33.52  % Maximum resident set size: 23552 pages
% 36.27/33.52  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------