%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV089-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:49:43 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.44s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.44s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% Number of literals : 2 ( 0 equ; 0 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(u56157,negated_conjecture,
$false,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u56157) ).
cnf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
$false,
u56157,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : HWV089-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:18:43 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.44/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % new_bool_1 with pid 58033 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.44/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.44/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.63 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 58035 completed with status 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.44/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.44/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.44/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.44/0.63 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.44/0.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.44/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.44/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.44/0.63
% 0.44/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.44/0.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.44/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.44/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 11791
% 0.44/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 11790
% 0.44/0.63 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.44/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.44/0.63 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.44/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.44/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.44/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.44/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 91040
% 0.44/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 33073
% 0.44/0.63
% 0.44/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.63 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.44/0.63 % System time : 0.027 s
% 0.44/0.63 % Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.44/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 13640 pages
% 0.44/0.63
% 0.44/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.44/0.63 % User time : 0.161 s
% 0.44/0.63 % System time : 0.041 s
% 0.44/0.63 % Total time : 0.202 s
% 0.44/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 11776 pages
% 0.44/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------