%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV092-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:49:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.26s 8.83s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% Number of literals : 2 ( 0 equ; 0 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(u2129544,negated_conjecture,
$false,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u2129544) ).
cnf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
$false,
u2129544,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : HWV092-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.46 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.46 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:18:52 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.58 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.58 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/8.83 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/8.83 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/8.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 882s (3) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting sh5l with 294s (1) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % new_bool_1 with pid 865306 completed with status 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.26/8.83 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/8.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 882s (3) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/8.83 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/8.83 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/8.83 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 587 seconds (587 total)
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 59s (1) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 353s (1) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % SubtermCWHack with pid 865310 completed with status 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/8.83 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/8.83 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 882s (3) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting new_bool_3 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting new_bool_1 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.26/8.83 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.26/8.83 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/8.83 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 587 seconds (587 total)
% 0.26/8.83 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 59s (1) cores
% 0.26/8.83 % Preprocessing time : 0.250 s
% 0.26/8.83
% 0.26/8.83 % Proof found!
% 0.26/8.83 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.26/8.83 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/8.83 % Parsed axioms : 696691
% 0.26/8.83 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 696690
% 0.26/8.83 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.26/8.83 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.26/8.83 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.26/8.83 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/8.83 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/8.83 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/8.83 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/8.83 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/8.83 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/8.83 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/8.83 % Termbank termtop insertions : 6950339
% 0.26/8.83 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2322716
% 0.26/8.83
% 0.26/8.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/8.83 % User time : 1.271 s
% 0.26/8.83 % System time : 0.608 s
% 0.26/8.83 % Total time : 1.879 s
% 0.26/8.83 % Maximum resident set size: 591128 pages
% 0.26/8.83
% 0.26/8.83 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/8.83 % User time : 7.248 s
% 0.26/8.83 % System time : 1.214 s
% 0.26/8.83 % Total time : 8.462 s
% 0.26/8.83 % Maximum resident set size: 457728 pages
% 0.26/8.83 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------