%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV093-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.28s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% Number of literals : 2 ( 0 equ; 0 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(u12823,negated_conjecture,
$false,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u12823) ).
cnf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
$false,
u12823,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : HWV093-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:19:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2359205 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.28/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 0.28/0.48 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 91s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2359209 completed with status 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.28/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.48 % SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 0.28/0.48 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 900 seconds (900 total)
% 0.28/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 82s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.28/0.48
% 0.28/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.28/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.28/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 2652
% 0.28/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2651
% 0.28/0.48 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.28/0.48 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.28/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22014
% 0.28/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10491
% 0.28/0.48
% 0.28/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.48 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.28/0.48 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.28/0.48 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.28/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 7720 pages
% 0.28/0.48
% 0.28/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.48 % User time : 0.049 s
% 0.28/0.48 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.28/0.48 % Total time : 0.068 s
% 0.28/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 6912 pages
% 0.28/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------