%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : HWV096-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:48:30 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.40s 8.82s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 2 ( 2 unt; 0 nHn; 2 RR)
% Number of literals : 2 ( 0 equ; 0 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 1 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(u1693507,negated_conjecture,
$false,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u1693507) ).
cnf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
$false,
u1693507,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : HWV096-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v6.1.0.
% 0.11/0.15 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.48 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.49 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.49 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.49 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:20:37 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.49 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.33/0.63 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.33/0.63 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/8.82 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.40/8.82 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/8.82 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 882s (3) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting new_bool_3 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting new_bool_1 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting sh5l with 294s (1) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % sh5l with pid 2361590 completed with status 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.40/8.82 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/8.82 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 882s (3) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting new_bool_3 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting new_bool_1 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting sh5l with 294s (1) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.40/8.82 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.40/8.82 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.40/8.82 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 293 seconds (293 total)
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2361591 completed with status 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.40/8.82 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.40/8.82 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 294 seconds (2352 total)
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 882s (3) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting new_bool_3 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting new_bool_1 with 588s (2) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting sh5l with 294s (1) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.40/8.82 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.40/8.82 % Search class: FUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.40/8.82 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 293 seconds (293 total)
% 0.40/8.82 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 30s (1) cores
% 0.40/8.82 % Preprocessing time : 0.384 s
% 0.40/8.82
% 0.40/8.82 % Proof found!
% 0.40/8.82 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.40/8.82 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/8.82 % Parsed axioms : 361152
% 0.40/8.82 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 361151
% 0.40/8.82 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.40/8.82 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.40/8.82 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.40/8.82 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % NegExts : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/8.82 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/8.82 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.40/8.82 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.40/8.82 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.40/8.82 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.40/8.82 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.40/8.82 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3633944
% 0.40/8.82 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1074843
% 0.40/8.82
% 0.40/8.82 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/8.82 % User time : 1.048 s
% 0.40/8.82 % System time : 0.707 s
% 0.40/8.82 % Total time : 1.755 s
% 0.40/8.82 % Maximum resident set size: 367500 pages
% 0.40/8.82
% 0.40/8.82 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/8.82 % User time : 6.800 s
% 0.40/8.82 % System time : 1.079 s
% 0.40/8.82 % Total time : 7.880 s
% 0.40/8.82 % Maximum resident set size: 228352 pages
% 0.40/8.82 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------