↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : ITP001^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:50:40 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 4.80s 4.98s
% Output   : Proof 4.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : ITP001^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Oct  2 22:28:53 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 4.80/4.98  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.80/4.98  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #24 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Iff mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET (∀ (V0x : Prop), Eq V0x V0x)) True
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #25 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET) True
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #26 (by clausification #[25]): Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET False
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #65 (by clausification #[24]): Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Eq (∀ (V0x : Prop), Eq V0x V0x) False)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #67 (by clausification #[65]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Eq (Not (Eq (skS.0 1 a) (skS.0 1 a))) True)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #68 (by clausification #[67]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Eq (Eq (skS.0 1 a) (skS.0 1 a)) False)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #69 (by clausification #[68]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Ne (skS.0 1 a) (skS.0 1 a))
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #70 (by clausification #[69]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Or (Eq (skS.0 1 a) False) (Eq (skS.0 1 a) False))
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #71 (by clausification #[69]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Or (Eq (skS.0 1 a) True) (Eq (skS.0 1 a) True))
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #72 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[70]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Eq (skS.0 1 a) False)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #73 (by forward demodulation #[72, 26]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq False True) (Eq (skS.0 1 a) False)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #74 (by clausification #[73]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (skS.0 1 a) False
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #75 (by identity loobHoist #[74]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 1 True) False) (Eq a False)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #588 (by eliminate duplicate literals #[71]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET True) (Eq (skS.0 1 a) True)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #589 (by forward demodulation #[588, 26]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq False True) (Eq (skS.0 1 a) True)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #590 (by clausification #[589]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq (skS.0 1 a) True
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #591 (by identity loobHoist #[590]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq (skS.0 1 True) True) (Eq a False)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #597 (by falseElim #[591]): Eq (skS.0 1 True) True
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #598 (by superposition #[597, 75]): ∀ (a : Prop), Or (Eq True False) (Eq a False)
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #599 (by clausification #[598]): ∀ (a : Prop), Eq a False
% 4.80/4.98  Clause #603 (by falseElim #[599]): False
% 4.80/4.98  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------