%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP001^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:03:56 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.26s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 0 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 3 ( 1 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 ^; 2 !; 0 ?; 2 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_51,type,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET: $o ).
thf(thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH,conjecture,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NL4aNOnBJF/E---3.1_524291.p',thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) ).
thf(thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF,axiom,
( mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET
<=> ! [X22: $o] :
( X22
<=> X22 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NL4aNOnBJF/E---3.1_524291.p',thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
( mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET
<=> ! [X22: $o] : $true ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_8,plain,
mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : ITP001^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.26 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.26 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.26 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.26 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:17:16 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.27 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.27 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.34 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.NL4aNOnBJF/E---3.1_524291.p
% 0.26/0.39 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.26/0.39 % partial match(1): HSLSSLSMSSSNSFA
% 0.26/0.39 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSLSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.26/0.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting additional_ho_4 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting pre_casc_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting pre_casc_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting pre_casc_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % pre_casc_8 with pid 524305 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Result found by pre_casc_8
% 0.26/0.39 % partial match(1): HSLSSLSMSSSNSFA
% 0.26/0.39 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSLSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.26/0.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting additional_ho_4 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting pre_casc_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true))
% 0.26/0.39 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.26/0.39 % Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SSFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.39 % partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.39 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % SubtermCWHack with pid 524309 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.26/0.39 % partial match(1): HSLSSLSMSSSNSFA
% 0.26/0.39 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSLSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.26/0.39 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting additional_ho_4 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting pre_casc_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true))
% 0.26/0.39 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true)
% 0.26/0.39 % Search class: HUUNF-FFSF00-SSFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.39 % partial match(1): HUUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.39 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.26/0.39 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.39 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.39
% 0.26/0.39 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.39 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.26/0.39 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.39 % Parsed axioms : 66
% 0.26/0.39 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 64
% 0.26/0.39 % Initial clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.39 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2
% 0.26/0.39 % Processed clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.39 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.26/0.39 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.26/0.39 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.39 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.39 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.39 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.39 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.39 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.39 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.26/0.39 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.39 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.39 % Termbank termtop insertions : 698
% 0.26/0.39 % Search garbage collected termcells : 259
% 0.26/0.39
% 0.26/0.39 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.39 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.26/0.39 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.39 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.26/0.39 % Maximum resident set size: 3700 pages
% 0.26/0.39
% 0.26/0.39 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.39 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.26/0.39 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.26/0.39 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.26/0.39 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.39 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------