%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP001^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:03:56 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.08s 0.26s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 0 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 0 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 2 ( 0 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(conj_thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH,conjecture,
$true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XKAA3mbB2O/E---3.1_1226417.p',conj_thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) ).
thf(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH]) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP001^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:17:32 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XKAA3mbB2O/E---3.1_1226417.p
% 0.08/0.26 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.08/0.26 % partial match(1): HSMSSMSSSSSNSFA
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNSFA.
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_14 with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_13 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % new_ho_14 with pid 1226430 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Result found by new_ho_14
% 0.08/0.26 % partial match(1): HSMSSMSSSSSNSFA
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNSFA.
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_14 with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.08/0.26 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.08/0.26 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SSFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.26 % partial match(1): HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_14 with 121s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 109s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 109s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1226434 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.26 % partial match(1): HSMSSMSSSSSNSFA
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNSFA.
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting new_ho_14 with 1200s (4) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.08/0.26 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.08/0.26 % Search class: HUHPF-FFSF00-SSFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.26 % partial match(1): HUHPF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.26 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 0.08/0.26 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.26 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.26
% 0.08/0.26 % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.26 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.26 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.26 % Parsed axioms : 24
% 0.08/0.26 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 23
% 0.08/0.26 % Initial clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % Processed clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.26 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.26 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.26 % Termbank termtop insertions : 199
% 0.08/0.26 % Search garbage collected termcells : 113
% 0.08/0.26
% 0.08/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.26 % User time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.26 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 3916 pages
% 0.08/0.26
% 0.08/0.26 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.26 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.26 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.08/0.26 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.08/0.26 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------