%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : ITP001_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 04:08:15 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 3.47s 1.21s % Output : Proof 5.60s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.07/0.12 % Problem : ITP001_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0. % 0.07/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 13:55:53 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.61 ________ _____ % 0.19/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.19/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.19/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.19/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.19/0.61 (2023-06-19) % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.19/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.19/0.61 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.19/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.19/0.61 % 0.19/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.19/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.19/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.19/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.08/1.05 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.08/1.05 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.81/1.07 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.81/1.07 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.81/1.08 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.81/1.08 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.81/1.08 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 3.47/1.17 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.47/1.19 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.47/1.20 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.47/1.20 Prover 6: proved (568ms) % 3.47/1.20 Prover 3: proved (572ms) % 3.47/1.21 % 3.47/1.21 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 3.47/1.21 % 3.47/1.21 % 3.47/1.21 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 3.47/1.21 % 3.47/1.21 Prover 5: stopped % 3.47/1.21 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 3.47/1.21 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 3.47/1.21 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 3.47/1.24 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.47/1.24 Prover 2: stopped % 4.16/1.25 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 4.16/1.26 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.16/1.27 Prover 0: stopped % 4.16/1.27 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 4.16/1.27 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 4.16/1.28 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 4.16/1.29 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 4.16/1.29 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 4.52/1.34 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 5.26/1.41 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.26/1.42 Prover 1: Found proof (size 1) % 5.26/1.42 Prover 1: proved (789ms) % 5.26/1.43 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.26/1.43 Prover 4: stopped % 5.26/1.44 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.26/1.44 Prover 7: stopped % 5.26/1.44 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.26/1.44 Prover 10: stopped % 5.60/1.45 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.60/1.45 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.60/1.45 Prover 8: stopped % 5.60/1.47 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.60/1.48 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.60/1.48 Prover 13: stopped % 5.60/1.49 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.60/1.49 Prover 11: stopped % 5.60/1.49 % 5.60/1.49 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.60/1.49 % 5.60/1.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 5.60/1.50 Assumptions after simplification: % 5.60/1.50 --------------------------------- % 5.60/1.50 % 5.60/1.50 (conj_thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) % 5.60/1.50 $false % 5.60/1.50 % 5.60/1.50 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 5.60/1.50 -------------------------------------------- % 5.60/1.50 ap_tp, ax_eq_p, ax_thm_2Ebool_2ET__DEF, ax_true_p, boolext, funcext, ibeta, % 5.60/1.50 kbeta, mem_c_2Ebool_2ET, mem_c_2Emin_2E_3D, stp_eq_fo_c_2Ebool_2ET, % 5.60/1.50 stp_inj_mem_o, stp_inj_surj_o, stp_iso_mem_o % 5.60/1.50 % 5.60/1.50 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 5.60/1.50 --------------------------------- % 5.60/1.50 % 5.60/1.50 Begin of proof % 5.60/1.50 | % 5.60/1.50 | CLOSE: (conj_thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) is inconsistent. % 5.60/1.50 | % 5.60/1.50 End of proof % 5.60/1.50 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 5.60/1.50 % 5.60/1.50 891ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------