%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:55:36 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 5.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 15 ~; 13 |; 6 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 1 sgn 31 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Epred__set_2EIN__DELETE,axiom,
! [X1,X15,X12,X17] :
( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X12),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15),s(X1,X17))))))
<=> ( s(X1,X12) != s(X1,X17)
& p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X12),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15)))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Epred__set_2EIN__DELETE) ).
fof(thm_2Epred__set_2EREST__DEF,axiom,
! [X1,X15] : s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15))) = s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15),s(X1,c_2Epred__set_2ECHOICE_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Epred__set_2EREST__DEF) ).
fof(thm_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET__DEF,axiom,
! [X1,X15,X16] :
( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X16))))
<=> ! [X5] :
( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X5),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15))))
=> p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X5),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X16)))) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET__DEF) ).
fof(thm_2Epred__set_2EREST__SUBSET,conjecture,
! [X1,X15] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Epred__set_2EREST__SUBSET) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X1,X15,X12,X17] :
( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X12),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15),s(X1,X17))))))
<=> ( s(X1,X12) != s(X1,X17)
& p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X12),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15)))) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thm_2Epred__set_2EIN__DELETE]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X45,X46,X47,X48] :
( ( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X45,X47),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X46),s(X45,X48))))))
| s(X45,X47) = s(X45,X48)
| ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X45,X47),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X46)))) )
& ( ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X45,X47),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X46),s(X45,X48))))))
| s(X45,X47) != s(X45,X48) )
& ( ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X45,X47),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X46),s(X45,X48))))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X45,X47),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X45,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X46)))) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X40,X41] : s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X40,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X40,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X41))) = s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X40,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X40,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X41),s(X40,c_2Epred__set_2ECHOICE_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X40,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X41))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Epred__set_2EREST__DEF]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X2),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3),s(X1,X4))))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X2),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2))) = s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EDELETE_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2),s(X1,c_2Epred__set_2ECHOICE_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35,X36] :
( ( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X34,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X35),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X34,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X36))))
| ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X34,esk4_3(X34,X35,X36)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X34,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X36)))) )
& ( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X34,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X35),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X34,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X36))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X34,esk4_3(X34,X35,X36)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X34,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X35)))) )
& ( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X30,X33),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X30,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X32))))
| ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X30,X33),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X30,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X31))))
| ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X30,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X31),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X30,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X32)))) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET__DEF])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X15] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X15)))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Epred__set_2EREST__SUBSET]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X2),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3))))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,X2),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(esk1_0,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(esk1_0,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),esk2_0))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(esk1_0,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),esk2_0)))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,esk4_3(X1,X2,X3)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ebool_2EIN_2E2(s(X1,esk4_3(X1,c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2)),X3)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X3)))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(esk1_0,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(esk1_0,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),esk2_0))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(esk1_0,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),esk2_0)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EREST_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : ITP004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/5.46 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.18/5.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/5.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/5.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/5.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/5.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/5.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/5.46 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:38:11 UTC 2026
% 0.18/5.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/5.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/5.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/5.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/5.86 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/5.86 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % sh5l with pid 3607702 completed with status 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.24/5.86 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.24/5.86 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.24/5.86 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.86 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.86 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3607705 completed with status 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/5.86 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/5.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.24/5.86 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.24/5.86 % Search class: FGHSM-FFMF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.86 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/5.86 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/5.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.24/5.86 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.24/5.86
% 0.24/5.86 % Proof found!
% 0.24/5.86 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/5.86 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/5.86 % Parsed axioms : 31
% 0.24/5.86 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 20
% 0.24/5.86 % Initial clauses : 16
% 0.24/5.86 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Initial clauses in saturation : 16
% 0.24/5.86 % Processed clauses : 905
% 0.24/5.86 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % ...subsumed : 811
% 0.24/5.86 % ...remaining for further processing : 94
% 0.24/5.86 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.24/5.86 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.24/5.86 % Generated clauses : 16101
% 0.24/5.86 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14510
% 0.24/5.86 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.24/5.86 % Paramodulations : 15847
% 0.24/5.86 % Factorizations : 238
% 0.24/5.86 % NegExts : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Equation resolutions : 16
% 0.24/5.86 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Total rewrite steps : 1448
% 0.24/5.86 % ...of those cached : 1326
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.86 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.86 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.86 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.86 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.24/5.86 % Current number of processed clauses : 90
% 0.24/5.86 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8
% 0.24/5.86 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.24/5.86 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.24/5.86 % Non-unit-clauses : 77
% 0.24/5.86 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13611
% 0.24/5.86 % ...number of literals in the above : 70046
% 0.24/5.86 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.24/5.86 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2384
% 0.24/5.86 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1774
% 0.24/5.86 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 709
% 0.24/5.86 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45
% 0.24/5.86 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 107
% 0.24/5.86 % BW rewrite match attempts : 64
% 0.24/5.86 % BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.24/5.86 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/5.86 % Termbank termtop insertions : 589132
% 0.24/5.86 % Search garbage collected termcells : 429
% 0.24/5.86
% 0.24/5.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/5.86 % User time : 0.278 s
% 0.24/5.86 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.24/5.86 % Total time : 0.294 s
% 0.24/5.86 % Maximum resident set size: 3696 pages
% 0.24/5.86
% 0.24/5.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/5.86 % User time : 0.282 s
% 0.24/5.86 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.24/5.86 % Total time : 0.305 s
% 0.24/5.86 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/5.86 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------