↑ Up

FindProof---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : FindProof---0.1
% Problem  : ITP010+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:44:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 27.08s 3.90s
% Output   : Proof 27.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   38 (  12   ~;   4   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   0 sgn   8   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f40,conjecture,
    ! [A_27a] :
      ( ne(A_27a)
     => ! [A_27b] :
          ( ne(A_27b)
         => ! [V0s] :
              ( mem(V0s,arr(A_27a,bool))
             => ! [V1t] :
                  ( mem(V1t,arr(A_27b,bool))
                 => ( ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t))
                  <=> ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t)) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE) ).

fof(f40_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A_27a] :
        ( ne(A_27a)
       => ! [A_27b] :
            ( ne(A_27b)
           => ! [V0s] :
                ( mem(V0s,arr(A_27a,bool))
               => ! [V1t] :
                    ( mem(V1t,arr(A_27b,bool))
                   => ( ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t))
                    <=> ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t)) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f40]) ).

fof(f40_nnf,plain,
    ? [A_27a] :
      ( ? [A_27b] :
          ( ? [V0s] :
              ( ? [V1t] :
                  ( ( ( ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t))
                      & p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t)) )
                    | ( p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t))
                      & ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(A_27a,A_27b),V0s),V1t)) ) )
                  & mem(V1t,arr(A_27b,bool)) )
              & mem(V0s,arr(A_27a,bool)) )
          & ne(A_27b) )
      & ne(A_27a) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f40_neg]) ).

fof(f40_sk,plain,
    ( ( ( ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6))
        & p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6)) )
      | ( p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6))
        & ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6)) ) )
    & mem(sk6,arr(sk4,bool))
    & mem(sk5,arr(sk3,bool))
    & ne(sk4)
    & ne(sk3) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sk3,sk4,sk5,sk6])],[f40_nnf]) ).

cnf(c274,plain,
    ( ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6))
    | ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f40_sk]) ).

cnf(p278,plain,
    ~ p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6)),
    inference(factoring,[status(thm)],[c274]) ).

cnf(c275,plain,
    ( p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6))
    | p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(esa)],[f40_sk]) ).

cnf(p277,plain,
    p(ap(ap(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq(sk3,sk4),sk5),sk6)),
    inference(factoring,[status(thm)],[c275]) ).

cnf(p279,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[p278,p277]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP010+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Sep 23 17:30:16 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  Running run_findproof /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 27.08/3.90  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 27.08/3.90  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------