↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : ITP010_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:35:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.15s 2.33s
% Output   : Refutation 5.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   2 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    6 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   64 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  56   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   9 avg)
%            Number of types       :    7 (   6 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0   ^;   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(u_type,type,
    u: $tType ).

thf(d_type,type,
    d: $tType ).

thf(du_type,type,
    du: $tType ).

thf(mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool_type,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool: $tType ).

thf(mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Efun_28tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_2Ctyop_2Emin_2Ebool_29_type,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Efun_28tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_2Ctyop_2Emin_2Ebool_29: $tType ).

thf(mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Efun_28tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_2Ctyop_2Emin_2Efun_28tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_2Ctyop_2Emin_2Ebool_29_29_type,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Efun_28tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_2Ctyop_2Emin_2Efun_28tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_2Ctyop_2Emin_2Ebool_29_29: $tType ).

thf(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool_decl,type,
    tyop_2Emin_2Ebool: d ).

thf(tyop_2Emin_2Efun_decl,type,
    tyop_2Emin_2Efun: d > d > d ).

thf(s_decl,type,
    s: d > u > du ).

thf(p_decl,type,
    p: mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool > $o ).

thf(c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2_decl,type,
    c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2: du > du > u ).

thf(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool_decl,type,
    j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool: du > mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: d,B: d,C: u,D: u] :
      ( ~ ( D @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( B @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ ( C @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( A @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2 ) @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ s ) @ j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ p )
    <=> ~ ( D @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( B @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ ( C @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( A @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2 ) @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ s ) @ j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ p ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: d,B: d,C: u,D: u] :
        ( ~ ( D @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( B @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ ( C @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( A @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2 ) @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ s ) @ j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ p )
      <=> ~ ( D @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( B @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ ( C @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ ( A @ tyop_2Emin_2Efun ) @ s ) @ c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2 ) @ ( tyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ s ) @ j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool @ p ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ~ $true,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(51,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[50]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP010_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 17:12:06 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.71/0.70  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.95/0.85  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (154ms). 
% 0.95/0.86  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.80/1.07  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.80/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.13/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 47 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.38/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 47 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.63/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 2.63/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.63/1.45  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.17/1.69  % [INFO] 	 [Domain constraints] Detected constraint on mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool 
% 3.17/1.69  % [INFO] 	 [Domain constraints] dom(mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool) ⊆ {mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2ET_2E0,mono_2Ec_2Ebool_2EF_2E0} 
% 5.15/2.32  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.15/2.33  % Time passed: 1834ms (effective reasoning time: 1458ms)
% 5.15/2.33  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.15/2.33  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 5.15/2.33  % No. of inferences in proof: 4
% 5.15/2.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1834 ms resp. 1458 ms w/o parsing
% 5.15/2.37  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.15/2.37  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------