%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP010_4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:35 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 9.40s 6.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 9 ( 7 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 5 ( 4 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 4 sgn 12 !; 0 ?; 12 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
u: $tType ).
tff(decl_sort2,type,
d: $tType ).
tff(decl_sort3,type,
du: $tType ).
tff(decl_sort4,type,
mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool: $tType ).
tff(decl_23,type,
tyop_2Emin_2Ebool: d ).
tff(decl_24,type,
tyop_2Emin_2Efun: ( d * d ) > d ).
tff(decl_25,type,
s: ( u * d ) > du ).
tff(decl_27,type,
p: mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool > $o ).
tff(decl_62,type,
j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool: du > mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool ).
tff(decl_4342,type,
c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2: ( du * du ) > u ).
tff(thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE,conjecture,
! [X1: d,X2: d,X29403: u,X147: u] :
( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X29403),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X147)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X29403),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X147))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE) ).
tff(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: d,X2: d,X29403: u,X147: u] :
( ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X29403),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X147)))))
<=> ~ p(j_mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ecardinal_2Ecardleq_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X29403),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X147))))) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ecardinal_2ECARD__NOT__LE]) ).
tff(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: d,X2: d,X29403: u,X147: u] : $true,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ $true,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP010_4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:44:50 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.40/6.18 % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.40/6.18 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 9.40/6.18 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 296 seconds (2368 total)
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting new_bool_3 with 888s (3) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting new_bool_1 with 888s (3) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting sh5l with 296s (1) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 296s (1) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % new_bool_3 with pid 2388982 completed with status 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 9.40/6.18 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 9.40/6.18 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 296 seconds (2368 total)
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting new_bool_3 with 888s (3) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 9.40/6.18 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 9.40/6.18 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 9.40/6.18 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 887 seconds (887 total)
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 80s (1) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting new_bool_3 with 89s (1) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 80s (1) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2388996 completed with status 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 9.40/6.18 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 9.40/6.18 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 296 seconds (2368 total)
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting new_bool_3 with 888s (3) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 9.40/6.18 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 9.40/6.18 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 9.40/6.18 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 887 seconds (887 total)
% 9.40/6.18 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 80s (1) cores
% 9.40/6.18 % Preprocessing time : 0.092 s
% 9.40/6.18
% 9.40/6.18 % Proof found!
% 9.40/6.18 % SZS status Theorem
% 9.40/6.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.40/6.18 % Parsed axioms : 28142
% 9.40/6.18 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 26554
% 9.40/6.18 % Initial clauses : 3659
% 9.40/6.18 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 828
% 9.40/6.18 % Initial clauses in saturation : 2831
% 9.40/6.18 % Processed clauses : 1
% 9.40/6.18 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % ...subsumed : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % ...remaining for further processing : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Generated clauses : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Paramodulations : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Factorizations : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % NegExts : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % ...of those cached : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional check models : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 9.40/6.18 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 9.40/6.18 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 9.40/6.18 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 9.40/6.18 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 9.40/6.18 % Current number of processed clauses : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2830
% 9.40/6.18 % ...number of literals in the above : 8121
% 9.40/6.18 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Condensation successes : 0
% 9.40/6.18 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1095781
% 9.40/6.18 % Search garbage collected termcells : 296018
% 9.40/6.18
% 9.40/6.18 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.40/6.18 % User time : 1.554 s
% 9.40/6.18 % System time : 0.126 s
% 9.40/6.18 % Total time : 1.680 s
% 9.40/6.18 % Maximum resident set size: 66980 pages
% 9.40/6.18
% 9.40/6.18 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.40/6.18 % User time : 5.611 s
% 9.40/6.18 % System time : 0.299 s
% 9.40/6.18 % Total time : 5.910 s
% 9.40/6.18 % Maximum resident set size: 58880 pages
% 9.40/6.18 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------