%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : ePrincess---1.0 % Problem : ITP012+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:36:21 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 180.65s 130.33s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.04/0.14 % Problem : ITP012+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0. % 0.04/0.14 % Command : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s % 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 3 02:54:10 EDT 2022 % 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.61/0.66 ____ _ % 0.61/0.66 ___ / __ \_____(_)___ ________ __________ % 0.61/0.66 / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/ % 0.61/0.66 / __/ ____/ / / / / / / /__/ __(__ |__ ) % 0.61/0.66 \___/_/ /_/ /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/ % 0.61/0.66 % 0.61/0.66 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic % 0.61/0.66 (ePrincess v.1.0) % 0.61/0.66 % 0.61/0.66 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015 % 0.61/0.66 (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015 % 0.61/0.66 (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner) % 0.61/0.66 Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). % 0.61/0.66 Bug reports to peter@backeman.se % 0.61/0.66 % 0.61/0.66 For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/ % 0.61/0.66 % 0.61/0.66 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.74/0.71 Prover 0: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 2.15/1.08 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 4.31/1.60 Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ... % 19.70/6.00 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 20.02/6.14 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 21.21/6.33 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 29.80/8.60 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 30.03/8.69 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 32.24/9.16 Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 32.24/9.18 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 39.70/11.61 Prover 0: stopped % 39.90/11.81 Prover 3: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 40.06/11.88 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 40.36/11.95 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 90.97/53.15 Prover 3: stopped % 91.25/53.35 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete % 91.30/53.39 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 92.55/53.83 Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 92.55/53.85 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 145.17/101.46 Prover 1: stopped % 145.46/101.66 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 145.46/101.72 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 146.10/101.89 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 156.68/110.83 Prover 5: stopped % 156.84/111.03 Prover 6: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 157.00/111.09 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 157.97/111.45 Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 157.97/111.46 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 174.13/126.71 Prover 2: stopped % 174.28/126.92 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all % 174.49/126.99 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 174.63/127.02 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 180.65/130.33 Prover 7: proved (3416ms) % 180.65/130.33 Prover 4: stopped % 180.65/130.33 Prover 6: stopped % 180.65/130.33 % 180.65/130.33 No countermodel exists, formula is valid % 180.65/130.33 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 180.65/130.33 % 180.65/130.33 Generating proof ... %------------------------------------------------------------------------------