↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP012_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   6   ~;   3   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn  30   !;   0   ?;  30   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool: $tType ).

tff(decl_sort2,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint: $tType ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    p: mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool > $o ).

tff(decl_71,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2: ( mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint * mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ) > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_73,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2: ( mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint * mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ) > mono_2Etyop_2Emin_2Ebool ).

tff(decl_75,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_77,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2: ( mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint * mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ) > mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_97,type,
    esk1_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_98,type,
    esk2_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(decl_99,type,
    esk3_0: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB,conjecture,
    ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X67: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66))
     => ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X67,X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X67) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RADD,axiom,
    ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X67: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66))
     => ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X67,X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X67) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RADD) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2Eint__sub,axiom,
    ! [X63: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X64: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X63,X64) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X63,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X64)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2Eint__sub) ).

tff(thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG,axiom,
    ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X65),X66) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66) )
      & ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG) ).

tff(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X65: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X66: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X67: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
        ( p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X66))
       => ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X67,X66)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X65,X67) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RSUB]) ).

tff(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X81: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X82: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X83: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X81,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X83,X82)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X81,X83) )
      | ~ p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X81,X82)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__RADD])])]) ).

tff(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X86: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X87: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X86,X87) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X86,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X87)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2Eint__sub]) ).

tff(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X84: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X85: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X84),X85) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X84,X85) )
      & ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X84,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X85)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X84,X85) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Einteger_2EINT__DIVIDES__NEG]) ).

tff(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk3_0) )
    & p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X37: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ~ p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X36))
      | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X37,X36)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X37) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tcf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X29,X36) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__add_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X36)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

tcf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] : mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__neg_2E1(X36)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X36),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(esk3_0,esk2_0)) != mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X29: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X36: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint,X37: mono_2Etyop_2Einteger_2Eint] :
      ( ~ p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X37))
      | ( mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__sub_2E2(X36,X37)) = mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(X29,X36) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    p(mono_2Ec_2Einteger_2Eint__divides_2E2(esk1_0,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : ITP012_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.43  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:47:16 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.56  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % new_bool_3 with pid 2636256 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.56  % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2636259 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.24/0.56  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.24/0.56  % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.56  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.24/0.56  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.56  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.56  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.56  % Parsed axioms                        : 158
% 0.24/0.56  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 143
% 0.24/0.56  % Initial clauses                      : 213
% 0.24/0.56  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 181
% 0.24/0.56  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 32
% 0.24/0.56  % Processed clauses                    : 86
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % ...subsumed                          : 49
% 0.24/0.56  % ...remaining for further processing  : 37
% 0.24/0.56  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 47
% 0.24/0.56  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Generated clauses                    : 401
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 218
% 0.24/0.56  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Paramodulations                      : 277
% 0.24/0.56  % Factorizations                       : 77
% 0.24/0.56  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Equation resolutions                 : 47
% 0.24/0.56  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Total rewrite steps                  : 96
% 0.24/0.56  % ...of those cached                   : 91
% 0.24/0.56  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of processed clauses  : 33
% 0.24/0.56  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.24/0.56  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.56  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.24/0.56  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 28
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 161
% 0.24/0.56  % ...number of literals in the above   : 731
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 362
% 0.24/0.56  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245
% 0.24/0.56  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 49
% 0.24/0.56  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.56  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 9866
% 0.24/0.56  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1775
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 4084 pages
% 0.24/0.56  
% 0.24/0.56  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.56  % User time                : 0.027 s
% 0.24/0.56  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Total time               : 0.036 s
% 0.24/0.56  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.24/0.56  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------