%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP018+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 5.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp,conjecture,
! [X15,X16] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15,X16)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X15,X16),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X15,X16),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15,X16)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp) ).
fof(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X9] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X9))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X9))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate) ).
fof(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp,axiom,
! [X15,X16] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15,X16)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X15,X16),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15,X16)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X15,X16] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15,X16)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X15,X16),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X15,X16),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15,X16)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) != s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X19,X20),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X19,X20),X21))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X19,X20),X21))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X22,X23] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X22,X23)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X22,X23),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X22,X23)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) != s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X3))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X3))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP018+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.38 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:50:55 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 1536763 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.45 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1536766 completed with status 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/5.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/5.45 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/5.45
% 0.14/5.45 % Proof found!
% 0.14/5.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/5.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/5.45 % Parsed axioms : 34
% 0.14/5.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 31
% 0.14/5.45 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.14/5.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.14/5.45 % Processed clauses : 3
% 0.14/5.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/5.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.14/5.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/5.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1078
% 0.14/5.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 351
% 0.14/5.45
% 0.14/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.45 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/5.45 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3956 pages
% 0.14/5.45
% 0.14/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.45 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/5.45 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.14/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/5.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------