%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP018+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 13.89s 7.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.89s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp,conjecture,
! [X13331,X13333] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X13331,X13333)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X13331,X13333),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X13331,X13333),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X13331,X13333)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp) ).
fof(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X9] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X9))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X9))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate) ).
fof(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp,axiom,
! [X13331,X13333] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X13331,X13333)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X13331,X13333),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X13331,X13333)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X13331,X13333] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X13331,X13333)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X13331,X13333),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X13331,X13333),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X13331,X13333)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) != s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X14904,X14905,X14906] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X14904,X14905),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X14904,X14905),X14906))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X14904,X14905),X14906))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X15486,X15487] : s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15486,X15487)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X15486,X15487),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X15486,X15487)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) != s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X3))))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X3))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))) = s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP018+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.50 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.50 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.50 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.50 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.50 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.50 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.50 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.50 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:51:10 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.51 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.51 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.89/7.99 % Version: 3.5.1
% 13.89/7.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 13.89/7.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_3 with 885s (3) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 885s (3) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting sh5l with 295s (1) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 295s (1) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % new_bool_1 with pid 2407801 completed with status 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 13.89/7.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 13.89/7.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_3 with 885s (3) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 885s (3) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 13.89/7.99 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 13.89/7.99 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 13.89/7.99 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 884 seconds (884 total)
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 80s (1) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 89s (1) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 80s (1) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % new_bool_1 with pid 2407805 completed with status 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 13.89/7.99 % Preprocessing class: FMLLSMLLSSSNFFN.
% 13.89/7.99 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 295 seconds (2360 total)
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_3 with 885s (3) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 885s (3) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 13.89/7.99 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 13.89/7.99 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 13.89/7.99 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 884 seconds (884 total)
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 80s (1) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Starting new_bool_1 with 89s (1) cores
% 13.89/7.99 % Preprocessing time : 0.218 s
% 13.89/7.99 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.89/7.99
% 13.89/7.99 % Proof found!
% 13.89/7.99 % SZS status Theorem
% 13.89/7.99 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.89/7.99 % Parsed axioms : 23090
% 13.89/7.99 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 19394
% 13.89/7.99 % Initial clauses : 7167
% 13.89/7.99 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1119
% 13.89/7.99 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6048
% 13.89/7.99 % Processed clauses : 916
% 13.89/7.99 % ...of these trivial : 209
% 13.89/7.99 % ...subsumed : 425
% 13.89/7.99 % ...remaining for further processing : 282
% 13.89/7.99 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 13.89/7.99 % Backward-rewritten : 12
% 13.89/7.99 % Generated clauses : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 13.89/7.99 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Paramodulations : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Factorizations : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % NegExts : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Total rewrite steps : 294
% 13.89/7.99 % ...of those cached : 232
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional check models : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 13.89/7.99 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 13.89/7.99 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 13.89/7.99 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 13.89/7.99 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 13.89/7.99 % Current number of processed clauses : 269
% 13.89/7.99 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 62
% 13.89/7.99 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 13.89/7.99 % Negative unit clauses : 106
% 13.89/7.99 % Non-unit-clauses : 97
% 13.89/7.99 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5137
% 13.89/7.99 % ...number of literals in the above : 13986
% 13.89/7.99 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 13.89/7.99 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1030
% 13.89/7.99 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 909
% 13.89/7.99 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 233
% 13.89/7.99 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 666
% 13.89/7.99 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 8
% 13.89/7.99 % BW rewrite match attempts : 346
% 13.89/7.99 % BW rewrite match successes : 55
% 13.89/7.99 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Condensation successes : 0
% 13.89/7.99 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2556300
% 13.89/7.99 % Search garbage collected termcells : 403891
% 13.89/7.99
% 13.89/7.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 13.89/7.99 % User time : 2.066 s
% 13.89/7.99 % System time : 0.157 s
% 13.89/7.99 % Total time : 2.223 s
% 13.89/7.99 % Maximum resident set size: 76168 pages
% 13.89/7.99
% 13.89/7.99 % -------------------------------------------------
% 13.89/7.99 % User time : 7.431 s
% 13.89/7.99 % System time : 0.441 s
% 13.89/7.99 % Total time : 7.872 s
% 13.89/7.99 % Maximum resident set size: 61952 pages
% 13.89/7.99 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------