%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP018_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:45 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 11 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 11 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 4 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn 19 !; 0 ?; 19 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
d: $tType ).
tff(decl_sort2,type,
u: $tType ).
tff(decl_sort3,type,
du: $tType ).
tff(decl_sort4,type,
mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal: $tType ).
tff(decl_23,type,
tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat: ( d * d ) > d ).
tff(decl_24,type,
tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself: d > d ).
tff(decl_27,type,
tyop_2Epair_2Eprod: ( d * d ) > d ).
tff(decl_28,type,
tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal: d ).
tff(decl_29,type,
s: ( u * d ) > du ).
tff(decl_50,type,
c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1: du > u ).
tff(decl_52,type,
c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1: du > u ).
tff(decl_54,type,
c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1: du > u ).
tff(decl_57,type,
c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0: u ).
tff(decl_59,type,
c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1: du > u ).
tff(decl_74,type,
mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1: mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal > mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal ).
tff(decl_86,type,
j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal: du > mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal ).
tff(decl_87,type,
esk1_0: d ).
tff(decl_88,type,
esk2_0: d ).
tff(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp,conjecture,
! [X30: d,X31: d] : ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X30,X31)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) = j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X30,X31),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X30,X31),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X30,X31)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp) ).
tff(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate,axiom,
! [X1: d,X2: d,X9: u] : ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X9)))))) = mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X9))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate) ).
tff(thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp,axiom,
! [X30: d,X31: d] : ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X30,X31)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))) = j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X30,X31),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X30,X31)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp) ).
tff(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X30: d,X31: d] : ( mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X30,X31)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) = j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X30,X31),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X30,X31),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X30,X31)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))))) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eneg__ulp]) ).
tff(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) != j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
tff(c_0_5,plain,
! [X40: d,X41: d,X42: u] : ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X40,X41),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X40,X41),X42)))))) = mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X40,X41),X42))))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real__negate]) ).
tff(c_0_6,plain,
! [X43: d,X44: d] : ( j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X43,X44)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))) = j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X43,X44),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X43,X44)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp]) ).
tcf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0))))) != j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(esk1_0,esk2_0),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(esk1_0,esk2_0)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
tcf(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1: d,X2: d,X3: u] : j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__negate_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X3)))))) = mono_2Ec_2Erealax_2Ereal__neg_2E1(j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),X3))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
tcf(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1: d,X2: d] : j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Eulp_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))) = j_mono_2Etyop_2Erealax_2Ereal(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__to__real_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat(X1,X2),c_2Ebinary__ieee_2Efloat__plus__min_2E1(s(tyop_2Ebool_2Eitself(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2)),c_2Ebool_2Ethe__value_2E0)))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ITP018_1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:53:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 1753661 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1753664 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44 % Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 119
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 116
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.11/0.44 % Processed clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.11/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1219
% 0.11/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 437
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3764 pages
% 0.11/0.44
% 0.11/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.44 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.11/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------