↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP019^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  24 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  155 (  15   ~;   4   |;   2   &; 130   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   11 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0   ^;   7   !;   0   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    tp__ty_2Enum_2Enum: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal: $tType ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    ap: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum: tp__ty_2Enum_2Enum > $i ).

thf(decl_39,type,
    c_2Enum_2E0: $i ).

thf(decl_40,type,
    fo__c_2Enum_2E0: tp__ty_2Enum_2Enum ).

thf(decl_45,type,
    inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal > $i ).

thf(decl_46,type,
    surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal: $i > tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ).

thf(decl_47,type,
    c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num: $i ).

thf(decl_48,type,
    c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv: $i ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    esk5_0: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal ).

thf(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ,conjecture,
    ! [X30: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
      ( ( X30
       != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
     => ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X30 ) ) )
       != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.70tmrEHTGR/E---3.1_2102775.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).

thf(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0,axiom,
    ! [X30: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
      ( ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X30 ) ) )
        = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
    <=> ( X30
        = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.70tmrEHTGR/E---3.1_2102775.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).

thf(stp_eq_fo_c_2Enum_2E0,axiom,
    ( ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 )
    = c_2Enum_2E0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.70tmrEHTGR/E---3.1_2102775.p',stp_eq_fo_c_2Enum_2E0) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X30: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
        ( ( X30
         != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
       => ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X30 ) ) )
         != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X30: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
        ( ( X30
         != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
       => ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X30 ) ) )
         != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X125: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
      ( ( ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X125 ) ) )
         != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
        | ( X125
          = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) )
      & ( ( X125
         != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
        | ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X125 ) ) )
          = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0])])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk5_0
     != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
    & ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk5_0 ) ) )
      = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X21: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
      ( ( X21
        = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X21 ) ) )
       != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 )
    = c_2Enum_2E0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[stp_eq_fo_c_2Enum_2E0]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk5_0 ) ) )
    = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk5_0
   != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ ( inj__ty_2Enum_2Enum @ fo__c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X21: tp__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal] :
      ( ( X21
        = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) )
      | ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ X21 ) ) )
       != ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( inj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ esk5_0 ) ) )
    = ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( surj__c_ty_2Epair_2Eprod_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal_ty_2Erealax_2Ereal @ ( ap @ c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ c_2Enum_2E0 ) )
   != esk5_0 ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ITP019^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.17  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:33:01 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.70tmrEHTGR/E---3.1_2102775.p
% 0.09/0.26  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.09/0.26  % partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA
% 0.09/0.26  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.09/0.26  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting new_ho_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting sh9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % full_lambda_5 with pid 2102821 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Result found by full_lambda_5
% 0.09/0.26  % partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA
% 0.09/0.26  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.09/0.26  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting new_ho_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.26  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.26  % Search class: HGHSM-FFMM31-MSFFFFBN
% 0.09/0.26  % partial match(1): HGHSM-FFMM31-DSFFFFBN
% 0.09/0.26  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2102834 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.26  % partial match(1): HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA
% 0.09/0.26  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMSSSNSFA.
% 0.09/0.26  % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (3) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting new_ho_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.09/0.26  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.09/0.26  % Search class: HGHSM-FFMM31-MSFFFFBN
% 0.09/0.26  % partial match(1): HGHSM-FFMM31-DSFFFFBN
% 0.09/0.26  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.26  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.26  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.26  
% 0.09/0.26  % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.26  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.26  % Parsed axioms                        : 71
% 0.09/0.26  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Initial clauses                      : 99
% 0.09/0.26  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 48
% 0.09/0.26  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 51
% 0.09/0.26  % Processed clauses                    : 88
% 0.09/0.26  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.09/0.26  % ...remaining for further processing  : 77
% 0.09/0.26  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.09/0.26  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.09/0.26  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.09/0.26  % Generated clauses                    : 122
% 0.09/0.26  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 98
% 0.09/0.26  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.09/0.26  % Paramodulations                      : 117
% 0.09/0.26  % Factorizations                       : 3
% 0.09/0.26  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.09/0.26  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Total rewrite steps                  : 45
% 0.09/0.26  % ...of those cached                   : 38
% 0.09/0.26  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.09/0.26  % Current number of processed clauses  : 68
% 0.09/0.26  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 26
% 0.09/0.26  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.26  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.09/0.26  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 39
% 0.09/0.26  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 55
% 0.09/0.26  % ...number of literals in the above   : 198
% 0.09/0.26  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.09/0.26  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 398
% 0.09/0.26  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 303
% 0.09/0.26  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.09/0.26  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64
% 0.09/0.26  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.09/0.26  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.09/0.26  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.09/0.26  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7084
% 0.09/0.26  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1052
% 0.09/0.26  
% 0.09/0.26  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.26  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.09/0.26  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.09/0.26  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.09/0.26  % Maximum resident set size: 3712 pages
% 0.09/0.26  
% 0.09/0.26  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.26  % User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.09/0.26  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.09/0.26  % Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.09/0.26  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.09/0.26  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------