↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP019^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:05 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 28.64s 28.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 28.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   43 (  10   ~;   0   |;   1   &;  29   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (   0   ^;   6   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29: $tType ).

thf(decl_211,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0: mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum ).

thf(decl_10214,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29 > mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29 ).

thf(decl_10217,type,
    mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num: mono_2Etyop_2Enum_2Enum > mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29 ).

thf(decl_10227,type,
    esk1_0: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29 ).

thf(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ,conjecture,
    ! [X42872: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29] :
      ( ( X42872
       != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) )
     => ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ X42872 )
       != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SXeJfKCx0d/E---3.1_1247044.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).

thf(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV,axiom,
    ! [X42869: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ X42869 ) )
      = X42869 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SXeJfKCx0d/E---3.1_1247044.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV) ).

thf(thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0,axiom,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) )
    = ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SXeJfKCx0d/E---3.1_1247044.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0) ).

thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X42872: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29] :
        ( ( X42872
         != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) )
       => ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ X42872 )
         != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X42872: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29] :
        ( ( X42872
         != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) )
       => ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ X42872 )
         != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X43021: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ X43021 ) )
      = X43021 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__INV]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( esk1_0
     != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) )
    & ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ esk1_0 )
      = ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X35701: mono_2Etyop_2Epair_2Eprod_28tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_2Ctyop_2Erealax_2Ereal_29] :
      ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ X35701 ) )
      = X35701 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ esk1_0 )
    = ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) )
    = ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__0]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv @ ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) )
    = esk1_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk1_0
   != ( mono_2Ec_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num @ mono_2Ec_2Enum_2E0 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ITP019^4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.17  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:33:35 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 16.33/16.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.SXeJfKCx0d/E---3.1_1247044.p
% 28.64/28.85  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 28.64/28.85  % partial match(3): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 28.64/28.85  % Preprocessing class: HMLLMLLLSSSCHFA.
% 28.64/28.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 289 seconds (2312 total)
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting new_ho_2 with 1156s (4) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting sh3l with 578s (2) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 289s (1) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting full_lambda_7 with 289s (1) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % lpo5_rw_fix with pid 1247848 completed with status 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Result found by lpo5_rw_fix
% 28.64/28.85  % partial match(3): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 28.64/28.85  % Preprocessing class: HMLLMLLLSSSCHFA.
% 28.64/28.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 289 seconds (2312 total)
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting new_ho_2 with 1156s (4) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting sh3l with 578s (2) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 289s (1) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
% 28.64/28.85  % SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 28.64/28.85  % Search class: HGUPM-FFMM21-MHFFFFNN
% 28.64/28.85  % partial match(3): FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 28.64/28.85  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 289 seconds (289 total)
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1247851 completed with status 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 28.64/28.85  % partial match(3): HMLMSLSLSSSCHFA
% 28.64/28.85  % Preprocessing class: HMLLMLLLSSSCHFA.
% 28.64/28.85  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 289 seconds (2312 total)
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting new_ho_2 with 1156s (4) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting sh3l with 578s (2) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 289s (1) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000)
% 28.64/28.85  % SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000
% 28.64/28.85  % Search class: HGUPM-FFMM21-MHFFFFNN
% 28.64/28.85  % partial match(3): FGUNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 28.64/28.85  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 289 seconds (289 total)
% 28.64/28.85  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 27s (1) cores
% 28.64/28.85  % Preprocessing time       : 0.042 s
% 28.64/28.85  
% 28.64/28.85  % Proof found!
% 28.64/28.85  % SZS status Theorem
% 28.64/28.85  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 28.64/28.85  % Parsed axioms                        : 63455
% 28.64/28.85  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 63378
% 28.64/28.85  % Initial clauses                      : 98
% 28.64/28.85  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 28.64/28.85  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 92
% 28.64/28.85  % Processed clauses                    : 10
% 28.64/28.85  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % ...remaining for further processing  : 9
% 28.64/28.85  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 28.64/28.85  % Generated clauses                    : 2
% 28.64/28.85  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 28.64/28.85  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Paramodulations                      : 2
% 28.64/28.85  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % NegExts                              : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 28.64/28.85  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 28.64/28.85  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 28.64/28.85  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 28.64/28.85  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 28.64/28.85  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 28.64/28.85  % Current number of processed clauses  : 8
% 28.64/28.85  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 28.64/28.85  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 28.64/28.85  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 28.64/28.85  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 83
% 28.64/28.85  % ...number of literals in the above   : 130
% 28.64/28.85  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 28.64/28.85  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 28.64/28.85  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 28.64/28.85  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 28.64/28.85  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 28.64/28.85  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2091019
% 28.64/28.85  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 445411
% 28.64/28.85  
% 28.64/28.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 28.64/28.85  % User time                : 0.449 s
% 28.64/28.85  % System time              : 0.231 s
% 28.64/28.85  % Total time               : 0.680 s
% 28.64/28.85  % Maximum resident set size: 126308 pages
% 28.64/28.85  
% 28.64/28.85  % -------------------------------------------------
% 28.64/28.85  % User time                : 11.840 s
% 28.64/28.85  % System time              : 0.405 s
% 28.64/28.85  % Total time               : 12.245 s
% 28.64/28.85  % Maximum resident set size: 109148 pages
% 28.64/28.85  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------