↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : ITP019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 00:33:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    1
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    4 (   3 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   4 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    1 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(44,axiom,
    ( s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X))) != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0)))
    | s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),X) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).

cnf(46,negated_conjecture,
    s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),'SKOLEMAAAQ5') != s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).

cnf(47,negated_conjecture,
    s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),'SKOLEMAAAQ5'))) = s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num_2E1(s(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,c_2Enum_2E0_2E0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).

cnf(278,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[44,47,46]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : ITP019+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  2 18:57:45 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T18:57:45
% 0.20/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n025.cluster.edu at 2022-06-02T18:57:45
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  #||
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.75  ||#
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.56/0.75  ;       873 formulas have been input or derived (from 45 formulas).
% 0.56/0.75  ;       278 (32%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.56/0.75  ;          278 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.56/0.75  ; 
% 0.56/0.75  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.009   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.002   1%   Assert                       (29 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.043  15%   Process new row              (828 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.020   7%   Resolution                   (88 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.009   3%   Paramodulation               (44 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (6 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.016   6%   Condensing                   (650 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.098  35%   Forward subsumption          (649 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.009   3%   Backward subsumption         (237 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.014   5%   Clause clause subsumption    (804 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.034  12%   Forward simplification       (828 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Backward simplification      (278 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.004   1%   Ordering                     (1,649 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.023   8%   Other
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.282        Total
% 0.56/0.75  ;     0.282        Real time
% 0.56/0.75  ; 
% 0.56/0.75  ; Term-hash-array has 906 terms in all.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 237 entries (237 at peak, 237 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,698 nodes (2,698 at peak, 2,698 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ;  Retrieved 1,995 possibly forward subsuming rows in 649 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ;  Retrieved 44 possibly backward subsumed rows in 237 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Path-index has 925 entries (925 at peak, 925 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Path-index has 4,066 nodes (4,066 at peak, 4,066 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Trie-index has 925 entries (925 at peak, 925 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Trie-index has 5,642 nodes (5,642 at peak, 5,642 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.75  ; Retrieved 353 generalization terms in 7,337 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Retrieved 46 instance terms in 42 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; Retrieved 6,494 unifiable terms in 504 calls.
% 0.56/0.75  ; 
% 0.56/0.75  ; The agenda of rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.56/0.75  ;     1 with value 19              1 with value 40               2 with value 50
% 0.56/0.75  ;     1 with value 25              2 with value 43               1 with value 56
% 0.56/0.75  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 3 entries:
% 0.56/0.75  ;     1 with value 42              1 with value 50               1 with value 88
% 0.56/0.75  ; The agenda of rows to give has 230 entries:
% 0.56/0.75  ;     2 with value (4 12)          5 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 56)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    11 with value (4 15)          5 with value (4 37)           6 with value (4 57)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     1 with value (4 16)          3 with value (4 38)           4 with value (4 58)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     2 with value (4 18)          2 with value (4 39)           4 with value (4 59)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     4 with value (4 21)         12 with value (4 40)           5 with value (4 60)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     9 with value (4 24)          9 with value (4 41)           4 with value (4 61)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     2 with value (4 25)          2 with value (4 42)           1 with value (4 64)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     5 with value (4 26)          9 with value (4 43)           1 with value (4 66)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     4 with value (4 27)          6 with value (4 44)           2 with value (4 67)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     1 with value (4 28)         12 with value (4 45)           1 with value (4 68)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     5 with value (4 29)         16 with value (4 46)           2 with value (4 69)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    14 with value (4 30)          3 with value (4 47)           2 with value (4 71)
% 0.56/0.75  ;    10 with value (4 31)          3 with value (4 49)           1 with value (4 72)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     8 with value (4 32)          1 with value (4 51)           1 with value (4 73)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     2 with value (4 33)          6 with value (4 52)           2 with value (4 74)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     4 with value (4 34)          4 with value (4 54)           1 with value (4 83)
% 0.56/0.75  ;     4 with value (4 35)          6 with value (4 55)
% 0.56/0.75  Evaluation took:
% 0.56/0.75    0.283 seconds of real time
% 0.56/0.75    0.262656 seconds of user run time
% 0.56/0.75    0.020018 seconds of system run time
% 0.56/0.75    [Run times include 0.01 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.56/0.75    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.56/0.75    0 page faults and
% 0.56/0.75    22,810,272 bytes consed.
% 0.56/0.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.75  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-02T18:57:45
% 0.56/0.75  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.75  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------