%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP019+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.10s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 16 ~; 6 |; 3 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 5 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ,conjecture,
! [X14] :
( mem(X14,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
=> ( X14 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X14) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).
fof(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0,axiom,
! [X14] :
( mem(X14,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
=> ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X14) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
<=> X14 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X14] :
( mem(X14,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
=> ( X14 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X14) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X14] :
( mem(X14,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
=> ( X14 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X14) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X25] :
( ( ~ mem(X25,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X25) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| X25 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) )
& ( ~ mem(X25,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
| X25 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X25) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
& esk1_0 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
& mem(esk1_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| X1 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
mem(esk1_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP019+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:51:43 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 1305891 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.43 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUPF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1305894 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.43 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43 % partial match(1): FGUPF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.43
% 0.10/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.10/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.10/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 18
% 0.10/0.43 % Initial clauses : 34
% 0.10/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 15
% 0.10/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.10/0.43 % Processed clauses : 21
% 0.10/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.10/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.10/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Generated clauses : 11
% 0.10/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.10/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Paramodulations : 10
% 0.10/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.10/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.10/0.43 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 20
% 0.10/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.10/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.10/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.10/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4
% 0.10/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 19
% 0.10/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.10/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.10/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.10/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2569
% 0.10/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 619
% 0.10/0.43
% 0.10/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3624 pages
% 0.10/0.43
% 0.10/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.43 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.10/0.43 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.10/0.43 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.10/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------