%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : ITP019+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 22:46:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.10s 4.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 22 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 32 ( 15 ~; 8 |; 3 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ,conjecture,
! [X319] :
( mem(X319,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
=> ( X319 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X319) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ) ).
fof(conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0,axiom,
! [X319] :
( mem(X319,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
=> ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X319) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
<=> X319 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0) ).
fof(ax_thm_2Earithmetic_2EALT__ZERO,axiom,
c_2Earithmetic_2EZERO = c_2Enum_2E0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/ITP001/ITP016+5.ax',ax_thm_2Earithmetic_2EALT__ZERO) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X319] :
( mem(X319,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
=> ( X319 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
=> ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X319) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__NZ]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( mem(esk1_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
& esk1_0 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
& ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X320] :
( ( ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X320) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| X320 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ~ mem(X320,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) )
& ( X320 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X320) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ~ mem(X320,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Ecomplex_2ECOMPLEX__INV__EQ__0])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_2Earithmetic_2EZERO = c_2Enum_2E0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax_thm_2Earithmetic_2EALT__ZERO]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X1 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0)
| ~ mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal))
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Earithmetic_2EZERO) = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0)
| ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,X1) != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0)
| ~ mem(X1,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]),c_0_9]),c_0_7]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
mem(esk1_0,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Erealax_2Ereal,ty_2Erealax_2Ereal)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__of__num,c_2Enum_2E0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ap(c_2Ecomplex_2Ecomplex__inv,esk1_0) = esk1_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_7]),c_0_9]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : ITP019+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 01:57:15 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.10/4.29 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 2.10/4.29 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 2.10/4.29 # Preprocessing time : 1.126 s
% 2.10/4.29
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof found!
% 2.10/4.29 # SZS status Theorem
% 2.10/4.29 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 2.10/4.29 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 9
% 2.10/4.29 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 2.10/4.29 # Parsed axioms : 16826
% 2.10/4.29 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16725
% 2.10/4.29 # Initial clauses : 574
% 2.10/4.29 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 73
% 2.10/4.29 # Initial clauses in saturation : 501
% 2.10/4.29 # Processed clauses : 504
% 2.10/4.29 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 2.10/4.29 # ...subsumed : 11
% 2.10/4.29 # ...remaining for further processing : 490
% 2.10/4.29 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Backward-rewritten : 18
% 2.10/4.29 # Generated clauses : 14569
% 2.10/4.29 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 14574
% 2.10/4.29 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 2.10/4.29 # Paramodulations : 14566
% 2.10/4.29 # Factorizations : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Equation resolutions : 3
% 2.10/4.29 # Current number of processed clauses : 472
% 2.10/4.29 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 2.10/4.29 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Non-unit-clauses : 459
% 2.10/4.29 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13546
% 2.10/4.29 # ...number of literals in the above : 132431
% 2.10/4.29 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Current number of archived clauses : 18
% 2.10/4.29 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 62831
% 2.10/4.29 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 315
% 2.10/4.29 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 2.10/4.29 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 33
% 2.10/4.29 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 2.10/4.29 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 2.10/4.29 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.10/4.29 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1340050
% 2.10/4.29
% 2.10/4.29 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.10/4.29 # User time : 1.462 s
% 2.10/4.29 # System time : 0.056 s
% 2.10/4.29 # Total time : 1.518 s
% 2.10/4.29 # Maximum resident set size: 93516 pages
% 2.10/25.27 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.10/25.28 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.10/25.32 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.32 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.33 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.34 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.35 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.36 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.36 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.36 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 2.10/25.36 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.36 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.36 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.37 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.37 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.37 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.37 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 2.10/25.39 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 2.10/25.39 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------