↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP020+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   6   ~;   3   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   2 sgn  15   !;   5   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ__INV,conjecture,
    ? [X3] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum)),X3),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0)))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ__INV) ).

fof(thm_2Epred__set_2EBIJ__SYM,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X28,X29] :
      ( ? [X30] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,X2),X30),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X28),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X29))))
    <=> ? [X31] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,X1),X31),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X29),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X28)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Epred__set_2EBIJ__SYM) ).

fof(thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ,axiom,
    ? [X3] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Enum_2Enum),X3),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X3] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum)),X3),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0)))))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ__INV]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X63,X64,X65,X66,X67,X69,X70,X71,X72,X73] :
      ( ( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X69,X70),esk2_4(X69,X70,X71,X72)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X69,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X71),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X70,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X72))))
        | ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X70,X69),X73),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X70,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X72),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X69,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X71)))) )
      & ( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X64,X63),esk1_4(X63,X64,X65,X66)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X64,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X66),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X63,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X65))))
        | ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X63,X64),X67),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X63,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X65),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X64,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X66)))) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Epred__set_2EBIJ__SYM])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Enum_2Enum),esk3_0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0)))),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X39] : ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum)),X39),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0)))))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,X2),X3),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X4),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X5))))
    | p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,X1),esk1_4(X1,X2,X4,X5)),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X2,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X5),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(X1,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X4)))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Enum_2Enum),esk3_0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ_2E3(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum)),X1),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Enum_2Enum),tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Enum_2Enum,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV_2E0)))))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ITP020+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:52:04 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.52  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % new_bool_3 with pid 1811105 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.52  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52  % Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52  % partial match(2): FGUSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1811114 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.52  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.52  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.20/0.52  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.52  % Search class: FGUSM-FFLF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52  % partial match(2): FGUSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.52  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.52  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.52  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.52  
% 0.20/0.52  % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.52  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.52  % Parsed axioms                        : 59
% 0.20/0.52  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 31
% 0.20/0.52  % Initial clauses                      : 245
% 0.20/0.52  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 190
% 0.20/0.52  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 55
% 0.20/0.52  % Processed clauses                    : 88
% 0.20/0.52  % ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.20/0.52  % ...subsumed                          : 45
% 0.20/0.52  % ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.20/0.52  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Generated clauses                    : 924
% 0.20/0.52  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 718
% 0.20/0.52  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.52  % Paramodulations                      : 877
% 0.20/0.52  % Factorizations                       : 46
% 0.20/0.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.20/0.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6
% 0.20/0.53  % ...of those cached                   : 5
% 0.20/0.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 40
% 0.20/0.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.20/0.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 38
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 672
% 0.20/0.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4161
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 443
% 0.20/0.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 379
% 0.20/0.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 45
% 0.20/0.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 41592
% 0.20/0.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2689
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.20/0.53  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4268 pages
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % User time                : 0.039 s
% 0.20/0.53  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Total time               : 0.046 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.20/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------