↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP020_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:55:59 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 45.84s 22.35s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 45.84s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  10 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   88 (  39   ~;  35   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   0 sgn  50   !;   5   ?;  27   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    del: $tType ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    bool: del ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    arr: ( del * del ) > del ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    mem: ( del * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    ap: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    p: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_47,type,
    c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV: del > $i ).

tff(decl_48,type,
    ty_2Epair_2Eprod: ( del * del ) > del ).

tff(decl_49,type,
    c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS: ( del * del ) > $i ).

tff(decl_50,type,
    c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ: ( del * del ) > $i ).

tff(decl_51,type,
    ty_2Enum_2Enum: del ).

tff(decl_83,type,
    esk26_4: ( $i * ( $i * ( del * del ) ) ) > $i ).

tff(decl_84,type,
    esk27_4: ( $i * ( $i * ( del * del ) ) ) > $i ).

tff(decl_85,type,
    esk28_0: $i ).

tff(conj_thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ__INV,conjecture,
    ? [X51] :
      ( p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum)),X51),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))))
      & mem(X51,arr(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ__INV) ).

tff(conj_thm_2Epred__set_2EBIJ__SYM,axiom,
    ! [X13: del,X14: del,X44] :
      ( mem(X44,arr(X13,bool))
     => ! [X45] :
          ( mem(X45,arr(X14,bool))
         => ( ? [X46] :
                ( p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X13,X14),X46),X44),X45))
                & mem(X46,arr(X13,X14)) )
          <=> ? [X47] :
                ( p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X14,X13),X47),X45),X44))
                & mem(X47,arr(X14,X13)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Epred__set_2EBIJ__SYM) ).

tff(conj_thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ,axiom,
    ? [X51] :
      ( p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum),X51),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)))
      & mem(X51,arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ) ).

tff(mem_c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV,axiom,
    ! [X13: del] : mem(c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(X13),arr(X13,bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mem_c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV) ).

tff(ap_tp,axiom,
    ! [X1: del,X2: del,X3] :
      ( mem(X3,arr(X1,X2))
     => ! [X4] :
          ( mem(X4,X1)
         => mem(ap(X3,X4),X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/ITP001/ITP001_2.ax',ap_tp) ).

tff(mem_c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS,axiom,
    ! [X13: del,X14: del] : mem(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(X13,X14),arr(arr(X13,bool),arr(arr(X14,bool),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X13,X14),bool)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mem_c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS) ).

tff(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X51] :
        ( p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum)),X51),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))))
        & mem(X51,arr(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ__INV]) ).

tff(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X197: del,X198: del,X199,X200,X201,X203] :
      ( ( ~ mem(X199,arr(X197,bool))
        | ~ mem(X200,arr(X198,bool))
        | ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X198,X197),X203),X200),X199))
        | ~ mem(X203,arr(X198,X197))
        | p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X197,X198),esk27_4(X197,X198,X199,X200)),X199),X200)) )
      & ( ~ mem(X199,arr(X197,bool))
        | ~ mem(X200,arr(X198,bool))
        | ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X198,X197),X203),X200),X199))
        | ~ mem(X203,arr(X198,X197))
        | mem(esk27_4(X197,X198,X199,X200),arr(X197,X198)) )
      & ( ~ mem(X199,arr(X197,bool))
        | ~ mem(X200,arr(X198,bool))
        | ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X197,X198),X201),X199),X200))
        | ~ mem(X201,arr(X197,X198))
        | p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X198,X197),esk26_4(X197,X198,X199,X200)),X200),X199)) )
      & ( ~ mem(X199,arr(X197,bool))
        | ~ mem(X200,arr(X198,bool))
        | ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X197,X198),X201),X199),X200))
        | ~ mem(X201,arr(X197,X198))
        | mem(esk26_4(X197,X198,X199,X200),arr(X198,X197)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Epred__set_2EBIJ__SYM])])])])])]) ).

tff(c_0_8,plain,
    ( p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum),esk28_0),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)))
    & mem(esk28_0,arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Eutil__prob_2ENUM__2D__BIJ])]) ).

tff(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X94: del] : mem(c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(X94),arr(X94,bool)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[mem_c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV]) ).

tff(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X52: del,X53: del,X54,X55] :
      ( mem(ap(X54,X55),X53)
      | ~ mem(X55,X52)
      | ~ mem(X54,arr(X52,X53)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ap_tp])])])]) ).

tff(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X95: del,X96: del] : mem(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(X95,X96),arr(arr(X95,bool),arr(arr(X96,bool),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X95,X96),bool)))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[mem_c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS]) ).

tff(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X226] :
      ( ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum)),X226),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))))
      | ~ mem(X226,arr(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum))) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: del,X5,X4,X3,X2: del] :
      ( ~ mem(X3,arr(X2,bool))
      | ~ mem(X4,arr(X1,bool))
      | ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X2,X1),X5),X3),X4))
      | ~ mem(X5,arr(X2,X1))
      | p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X1,X2),esk26_4(X2,X1,X3,X4)),X4),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_14,plain,
    p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum),esk28_0),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: del] : mem(c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(X1),arr(X1,bool)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

tcf(c_0_16,plain,
    mem(esk28_0,arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X5,X4,X3,X2: del,X1: del] :
      ( ~ mem(X3,arr(X1,bool))
      | ~ mem(X4,arr(X2,bool))
      | ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(X1,X2),X5),X3),X4))
      | ~ mem(X5,arr(X1,X2))
      | mem(esk26_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),arr(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

tcf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X2: del,X4,X3,X1: del] :
      ( ~ mem(X4,X1)
      | ~ mem(X3,arr(X1,X2))
      | mem(ap(X3,X4),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

tcf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: del,X2: del] : mem(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(X1,X2),arr(arr(X1,bool),arr(arr(X2,bool),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2),bool)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

tcf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ~ p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum)),X3),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))))
      | ~ mem(X3,arr(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

tcf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ mem(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),bool))
    | p(ap(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2EBIJ(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum)),esk26_4(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum,ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum))),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

tcf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ mem(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),bool))
    | mem(esk26_4(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),ty_2Enum_2Enum,ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),arr(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

tcf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X3,X2: del,X1: del] :
      ( ~ mem(X3,arr(X1,bool))
      | mem(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(X1,X2),X3),arr(arr(X2,bool),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2),bool))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

tcf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ mem(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),c_2Epred__set_2EUNIV(ty_2Enum_2Enum)),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(ty_2Enum_2Enum,ty_2Enum_2Enum),bool)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

tcf(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X4,X3,X2: del,X1: del] :
      ( ~ mem(X3,arr(X1,bool))
      | ~ mem(X4,arr(X2,bool))
      | mem(ap(ap(c_2Epred__set_2ECROSS(X1,X2),X3),X4),arr(ty_2Epair_2Eprod(X1,X2),bool)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP020_2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/15.53  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.11/15.53  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/15.53  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/15.53  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/15.53  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/15.53  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/15.53  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/15.53  % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:55:19 UTC 2026
% 0.11/15.53  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/15.53  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/15.58  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/15.58  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 45.84/22.35  % Version: 3.5.1
% 45.84/22.35  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 45.84/22.35  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1759849 completed with status 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 45.84/22.35  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 45.84/22.35  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 45.84/22.35  % No SInE strategy applied
% 45.84/22.35  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 45.84/22.35  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 1759870 completed with status 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 45.84/22.35  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 45.84/22.35  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 45.84/22.35  % No SInE strategy applied
% 45.84/22.35  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 45.84/22.35  % Scheduled 12 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting G-E--_107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 123s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting U----_100_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_ND_S04AN with 123s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 123s (1) cores
% 45.84/22.35  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 45.84/22.35  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 45.84/22.35  
% 45.84/22.35  % Proof found!
% 45.84/22.35  % SZS status Theorem
% 45.84/22.35  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 45.84/22.35  % Parsed axioms                        : 111
% 45.84/22.35  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Initial clauses                      : 435
% 45.84/22.35  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 300
% 45.84/22.35  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 135
% 45.84/22.35  % Processed clauses                    : 22908
% 45.84/22.35  % ...of these trivial                  : 131
% 45.84/22.35  % ...subsumed                          : 19099
% 45.84/22.35  % ...remaining for further processing  : 3678
% 45.84/22.35  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8747
% 45.84/22.35  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Backward-subsumed                    : 227
% 45.84/22.35  % Backward-rewritten                   : 174
% 45.84/22.35  % Generated clauses                    : 244416
% 45.84/22.35  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 211923
% 45.84/22.35  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 97
% 45.84/22.35  % Paramodulations                      : 235308
% 45.84/22.35  % Factorizations                       : 360
% 45.84/22.35  % NegExts                              : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Equation resolutions                 : 8748
% 45.84/22.35  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Total rewrite steps                  : 109992
% 45.84/22.35  % ...of those cached                   : 109130
% 45.84/22.35  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 45.84/22.35  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 45.84/22.35  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 45.84/22.35  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 45.84/22.35  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 45.84/22.35  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3159
% 45.84/22.35  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 211
% 45.84/22.35  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 45.84/22.35  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 45.84/22.35  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2945
% 45.84/22.35  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 185308
% 45.84/22.35  % ...number of literals in the above   : 853839
% 45.84/22.35  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Current number of archived clauses   : 518
% 45.84/22.35  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1463371
% 45.84/22.35  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 213408
% 45.84/22.35  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 12517
% 45.84/22.35  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14269
% 45.84/22.35  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1278
% 45.84/22.35  % BW rewrite match successes           : 92
% 45.84/22.35  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 45.84/22.35  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4137163
% 45.84/22.35  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 3892
% 45.84/22.35  
% 45.84/22.35  % -------------------------------------------------
% 45.84/22.35  % User time                : 6.354 s
% 45.84/22.35  % System time              : 0.143 s
% 45.84/22.35  % Total time               : 6.498 s
% 45.84/22.35  % Maximum resident set size: 4504 pages
% 45.84/22.35  
% 45.84/22.35  % -------------------------------------------------
% 45.84/22.35  % User time                : 31.236 s
% 45.84/22.35  % System time              : 1.112 s
% 45.84/22.35  % Total time               : 32.347 s
% 45.84/22.35  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 45.84/22.35  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------