%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP023+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:53:52 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 4 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__BALL,conjecture,
! [X9,X21] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X9),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X21)))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__BALL) ).
fof(thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__SUBSET,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X22),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X23))))
& p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X23)))) )
=> p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X22)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__SUBSET) ).
fof(thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBALL__SUBSET__CBALL,axiom,
! [X9,X21] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X9),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X21))))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Ecball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X9),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X21)))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBALL__SUBSET__CBALL) ).
fof(thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__CBALL,axiom,
! [X9,X21] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Ecball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X9),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X21)))))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__CBALL) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X9,X21] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X9),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X21)))))))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__BALL]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X58,X59] :
( p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X58))))
| ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X58),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X59))))
| ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X59)))) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__SUBSET])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X62,X63] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X62),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X63))))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Ecball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X62),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X63)))))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBALL__SUBSET__CBALL]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X60,X61] : p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Ecball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X60),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X61)))))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[thm_2Ereal__topology_2EBOUNDED__CBALL]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,esk1_0),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,esk2_0)))))))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X1))))
| ~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X1))))
| p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),X2)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Epred__set_2ESUBSET_2E2(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X1),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X2))))),s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Ecball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X1),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X2)))))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Ecball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X1),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X2)))))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,esk1_0),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,esk2_0)))))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
p(s(tyop_2Emin_2Ebool,c_2Ereal__topology_2Ebounded__def_2E1(s(tyop_2Emin_2Efun(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Emin_2Ebool),c_2Ereal__topology_2Eball_2E1(s(tyop_2Epair_2Eprod(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal),c_2Epair_2E_2C_2E2(s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X1),s(tyop_2Erealax_2Ereal,X2)))))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP023+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Sun Sep 20 21:49:58 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % new_bool_1 with pid 692298 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFMS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 692303 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FGUSS-FFMF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % partial match(1): FGUSS-FFMS31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 53
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 35
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 216
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 183
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 67
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 36
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 28
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 546
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 408
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 498
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 46
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 14
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 11
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 27
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 24
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 374
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 2160
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 149
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 112
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 36
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 23789
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1698
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3988 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.018 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------