↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP027^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.41s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (  20 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  448 (  18   ~;  14   |;  19   &; 383   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    8 (   7 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   37 (  37   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   2 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   9   ^;  28   !;   0   ?;  37   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    set_c: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    set_c_d_c_d: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    set_c_d: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    carrie1948989069_d_a_e: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort5,type,
    c: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort6,type,
    d: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort7,type,
    set_c_d_c_d_c_d: $tType ).

thf(decl_61,type,
    carr_p1636662547_d_a_e: set_c > ( c > carrie1948989069_d_a_e ) > set_c_d ).

thf(decl_71,type,
    prod_m854557927_d_a_e: set_c > ( c > carrie1948989069_d_a_e ) > ( c > d ) > c > d ).

thf(decl_80,type,
    prod_p131511076_d_a_e: set_c > ( c > carrie1948989069_d_a_e ) > ( c > d ) > ( c > d ) > c > d ).

thf(decl_83,type,
    prod_z1214987823_d_a_e: set_c > ( c > carrie1948989069_d_a_e ) > c > d ).

thf(decl_112,type,
    pi_c_d_c_d_c_d: set_c_d > ( ( c > d ) > set_c_d_c_d ) > set_c_d_c_d_c_d ).

thf(decl_116,type,
    pi_c_d_c_d: set_c_d > ( ( c > d ) > set_c_d ) > set_c_d_c_d ).

thf(decl_164,type,
    member_c_d_c_d_c_d: ( ( c > d ) > ( c > d ) > c > d ) > set_c_d_c_d_c_d > $o ).

thf(decl_168,type,
    member_c_d_c_d: ( ( c > d ) > c > d ) > set_c_d_c_d > $o ).

thf(decl_186,type,
    member_c_d: ( c > d ) > set_c_d > $o ).

thf(decl_195,type,
    i: set_c ).

thf(decl_196,type,
    m: c > carrie1948989069_d_a_e ).

thf(decl_198,type,
    esk1_0: c > d ).

thf(conj_2,conjecture,
    ! [X998: c > d] :
      ( ~ ( member_c_d @ X998 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
      | ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X998 @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        = X998 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tNKZCJWw6m/E---3.1_261664.p',conj_2) ).

thf(conj_1,hypothesis,
    ( ( member_c_d_c_d_c_d @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m )
      @ ( pi_c_d_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
        @ ^ [X992: c > d] :
            ( pi_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
            @ ^ [X993: c > d] : ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ! [X995: c > d] :
            ( ( member_c_d @ X995 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
           => ! [X996: c > d] :
                ( ( member_c_d @ X996 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
               => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 @ X995 ) @ X996 )
                  = ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X995 @ X996 ) ) ) ) ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ! [X995: c > d] :
            ( ( member_c_d @ X995 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
           => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 @ X995 )
              = ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X995 @ X994 ) ) ) )
    & ( member_c_d_c_d @ ( prod_m854557927_d_a_e @ i @ m )
      @ ( pi_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
        @ ^ [X997: c > d] : ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_m854557927_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 ) @ X994 )
          = ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) )
    & ( member_c_d @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ X994 )
          = X994 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tNKZCJWw6m/E---3.1_261664.p',conj_1) ).

thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X998: c > d] :
        ( ~ ( member_c_d @ X998 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X998 @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
          = X998 ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_2]) ).

thf(c_0_3,hypothesis,
    ( ( member_c_d_c_d_c_d @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m )
      @ ( pi_c_d_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
        @ ^ [Z0: c > d] :
            ( pi_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
            @ ^ [Z1: c > d] : ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ! [X995: c > d] :
            ( ( member_c_d @ X995 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
           => ! [X996: c > d] :
                ( ( member_c_d @ X996 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
               => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 @ X995 ) @ X996 )
                  = ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X995 @ X996 ) ) ) ) ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ! [X995: c > d] :
            ( ( member_c_d @ X995 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
           => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 @ X995 )
              = ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X995 @ X994 ) ) ) )
    & ( member_c_d_c_d @ ( prod_m854557927_d_a_e @ i @ m )
      @ ( pi_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
        @ ^ [Z0: c > d] : ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_m854557927_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X994 ) @ X994 )
          = ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) )
    & ( member_c_d @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
    & ! [X994: c > d] :
        ( ( member_c_d @ X994 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
       => ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ X994 )
          = X994 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X998: c > d] :
        ( ~ ( member_c_d @ X998 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X998 @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
          = X998 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
    ! [X1408: c > d,X1409: c > d,X1410: c > d,X1411: c > d,X1412: c > d,X1413: c > d,X1414: c > d] :
      ( ( member_c_d_c_d_c_d @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m )
        @ ( pi_c_d_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
          @ ^ [Z0: c > d] :
              ( pi_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
              @ ^ [Z1: c > d] : ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( member_c_d @ X1408 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ~ ( member_c_d @ X1409 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ~ ( member_c_d @ X1410 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X1408 @ X1409 ) @ X1410 )
          = ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X1408 @ ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X1409 @ X1410 ) ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( member_c_d @ X1411 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ~ ( member_c_d @ X1412 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X1411 @ X1412 )
          = ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X1412 @ X1411 ) ) )
      & ( member_c_d_c_d @ ( prod_m854557927_d_a_e @ i @ m )
        @ ( pi_c_d_c_d @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m )
          @ ^ [Z0: c > d] : ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( member_c_d @ X1413 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_m854557927_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X1413 ) @ X1413 )
          = ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) )
      & ( member_c_d @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
      & ( ~ ( member_c_d @ X1414 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        | ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ X1414 )
          = X1414 ) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( member_c_d @ esk1_0 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
    & ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ esk1_0 @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
     != esk1_0 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ! [X17: c > d] :
      ( ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ X17 )
        = X17 )
      | ~ ( member_c_d @ X17 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ! [X17: c > d,X18: c > d] :
      ( ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X17 @ X18 )
        = ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X18 @ X17 ) )
      | ~ ( member_c_d @ X17 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
      | ~ ( member_c_d @ X18 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    member_c_d @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ esk1_0 @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
   != esk1_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ! [X17: c > d] :
      ( ( ( prod_p131511076_d_a_e @ i @ m @ X17 @ ( prod_z1214987823_d_a_e @ i @ m ) )
        = X17 )
      | ~ ( member_c_d @ X17 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ) ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    member_c_d @ esk1_0 @ ( carr_p1636662547_d_a_e @ i @ m ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP027^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:38:00 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.27  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.tNKZCJWw6m/E---3.1_261664.p
% 0.41/0.39  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.41/0.39  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 0.41/0.39  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % new_bool_2 with pid 261680 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Result found by new_bool_2
% 0.41/0.39  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 0.41/0.39  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.41/0.39  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.39  % Search class: HGUSF-FSLM32-MHHFFSNN
% 0.41/0.39  % partial match(2): HGUSM-FSLM32-MHHFFSBN
% 0.41/0.39  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % SubtermCWHack with pid 261682 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.41/0.39  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 0.41/0.39  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.41/0.39  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.39  % Search class: HGUSF-FSLM32-MHHFFSNN
% 0.41/0.39  % partial match(2): HGUSM-FSLM32-MHHFFSBN
% 0.41/0.39  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.39  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.39  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.41/0.39  
% 0.41/0.39  % Proof found!
% 0.41/0.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.39  % Parsed axioms                        : 587
% 0.41/0.39  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 480
% 0.41/0.39  % Initial clauses                      : 161
% 0.41/0.39  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
% 0.41/0.39  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 145
% 0.41/0.39  % Processed clauses                    : 203
% 0.41/0.39  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % ...subsumed                          : 24
% 0.41/0.39  % ...remaining for further processing  : 179
% 0.41/0.39  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.41/0.39  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Generated clauses                    : 2194
% 0.41/0.39  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2181
% 0.41/0.39  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Paramodulations                      : 2163
% 0.41/0.39  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.41/0.39  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.41/0.39  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Total rewrite steps                  : 9
% 0.41/0.39  % ...of those cached                   : 5
% 0.41/0.39  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.41/0.39  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.41/0.39  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.41/0.39  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.41/0.39  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.41/0.39  % Current number of processed clauses  : 177
% 0.41/0.39  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
% 0.41/0.39  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.39  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.41/0.39  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 169
% 0.41/0.39  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2122
% 0.41/0.39  % ...number of literals in the above   : 9089
% 0.41/0.39  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4585
% 0.41/0.39  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2666
% 0.41/0.39  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 24
% 0.41/0.39  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.41/0.39  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.41/0.39  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 118796
% 0.41/0.39  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 8773
% 0.41/0.39  
% 0.41/0.39  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.39  % User time                : 0.054 s
% 0.41/0.39  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.41/0.39  % Total time               : 0.069 s
% 0.41/0.39  % Maximum resident set size: 6540 pages
% 0.41/0.39  
% 0.41/0.39  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.39  % User time                : 0.080 s
% 0.41/0.39  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 0.41/0.39  % Total time               : 0.101 s
% 0.41/0.39  % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 0.41/0.39  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------