↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP032^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.50s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   55 (   2 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   30 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  284 (  26   ~;  25   |;  10   &; 220   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   25 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   15 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0   ^;  22   !;   0   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    binary1439146945Tree_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    set_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    int: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    binary717961607le_T_a: binary1439146945Tree_a > a > binary1439146945Tree_a > binary1439146945Tree_a ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    binary945792244etOf_a: binary1439146945Tree_a > set_a ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    binary1721989714Tree_a: ( a > int ) > binary1439146945Tree_a > $o ).

thf(decl_46,type,
    ord_less_int: int > int > $o ).

thf(decl_55,type,
    member_a: a > set_a > $o ).

thf(decl_56,type,
    e: a ).

thf(decl_57,type,
    h: a > int ).

thf(decl_58,type,
    t1: binary1439146945Tree_a ).

thf(decl_59,type,
    t2: binary1439146945Tree_a ).

thf(decl_60,type,
    w: a ).

thf(decl_61,type,
    x: a ).

thf(decl_137,type,
    esk68_4: ( a > int ) > binary1439146945Tree_a > a > binary1439146945Tree_a > a ).

thf(decl_138,type,
    esk69_4: ( a > int ) > binary1439146945Tree_a > a > binary1439146945Tree_a > a ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ord_less_int @ ( h @ w ) @ ( h @ x ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HxfTqrLz7r/E---3.1_2968632.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_19_sortedTree_Osimps_I2_J,axiom,
    ! [X16: a > int,X17: binary1439146945Tree_a,X18: a,X19: binary1439146945Tree_a] :
      ( ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X16 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X17 @ X18 @ X19 ) )
    <=> ( ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X16 @ X17 )
        & ! [X20: a] :
            ( ( member_a @ X20 @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X17 ) )
           => ( ord_less_int @ ( X16 @ X20 ) @ ( X16 @ X18 ) ) )
        & ! [X20: a] :
            ( ( member_a @ X20 @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X19 ) )
           => ( ord_less_int @ ( X16 @ X18 ) @ ( X16 @ X20 ) ) )
        & ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X16 @ X19 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HxfTqrLz7r/E---3.1_2968632.p',fact_19_sortedTree_Osimps_I2_J) ).

thf(fact_7_xeqe,axiom,
    ( ( h @ x )
    = ( h @ e ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HxfTqrLz7r/E---3.1_2968632.p',fact_7_xeqe) ).

thf(fact_1_s,axiom,
    binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HxfTqrLz7r/E---3.1_2968632.p',fact_1_s) ).

thf(fact_0_whSet,axiom,
    member_a @ w @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ t1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HxfTqrLz7r/E---3.1_2968632.p',fact_0_whSet) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( h @ w ) @ ( h @ x ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( h @ w ) @ ( h @ x ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( h @ w ) @ ( h @ x ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1642: a > int,X1643: binary1439146945Tree_a,X1644: a,X1645: binary1439146945Tree_a,X1646: a,X1647: a,X1648: a > int,X1649: binary1439146945Tree_a,X1650: a,X1651: binary1439146945Tree_a] :
      ( ( ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1642 @ X1643 )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1642 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1643 @ X1644 @ X1645 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( member_a @ X1646 @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X1643 ) )
        | ( ord_less_int @ ( X1642 @ X1646 ) @ ( X1642 @ X1644 ) )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1642 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1643 @ X1644 @ X1645 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( member_a @ X1647 @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X1645 ) )
        | ( ord_less_int @ ( X1642 @ X1644 ) @ ( X1642 @ X1647 ) )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1642 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1643 @ X1644 @ X1645 ) ) )
      & ( ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1642 @ X1645 )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1642 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1643 @ X1644 @ X1645 ) ) )
      & ( ( member_a @ ( esk69_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X1651 ) )
        | ( member_a @ ( esk68_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X1649 ) )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1649 )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1651 )
        | ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( X1648 @ X1650 ) @ ( X1648 @ ( esk69_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) )
        | ( member_a @ ( esk68_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X1649 ) )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1649 )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1651 )
        | ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) )
      & ( ( member_a @ ( esk69_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X1651 ) )
        | ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( X1648 @ ( esk68_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) @ ( X1648 @ X1650 ) )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1649 )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1651 )
        | ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( X1648 @ X1650 ) @ ( X1648 @ ( esk69_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) )
        | ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( X1648 @ ( esk68_4 @ X1648 @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) @ ( X1648 @ X1650 ) )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1649 )
        | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ X1651 )
        | ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1648 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1649 @ X1650 @ X1651 ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_19_sortedTree_Osimps_I2_J])])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( h @ w ) @ ( h @ x ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ( h @ x )
    = ( h @ e ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_7_xeqe]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1: binary1439146945Tree_a,X2: a,X16: a > int,X5: a,X3: binary1439146945Tree_a] :
      ( ( ord_less_int @ ( X16 @ X2 ) @ ( X16 @ X5 ) )
      | ~ ( member_a @ X2 @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( binary1721989714Tree_a @ X16 @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ X1 @ X5 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ ( binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_s]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_int @ ( h @ w ) @ ( h @ e ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X2: a] :
      ( ( ord_less_int @ ( h @ X2 ) @ ( h @ e ) )
      | ~ ( member_a @ X2 @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ t1 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    member_a @ w @ ( binary945792244etOf_a @ t1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_whSet]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP032^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.18  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:40:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.27  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.HxfTqrLz7r/E---3.1_2968632.p
% 0.50/0.47  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.50/0.47  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLCHFA.
% 0.50/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting ehoh_best4 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting additional_ho_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % new_bool_3 with pid 2968668 completed with status 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.50/0.47  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLCHFA.
% 0.50/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting ehoh_best4 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting additional_ho_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.50/0.47  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.50/0.47  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 0.50/0.47  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2968680 completed with status 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.50/0.47  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLCHFA.
% 0.50/0.47  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting ehoh_best4 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting additional_ho_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.50/0.47  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.50/0.47  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 0.50/0.47  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.50/0.47  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.50/0.47  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.50/0.47  
% 0.50/0.47  % Proof found!
% 0.50/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.50/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.50/0.47  % Parsed axioms                        : 394
% 0.50/0.47  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 125
% 0.50/0.47  % Initial clauses                      : 549
% 0.50/0.47  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 12
% 0.50/0.47  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 537
% 0.50/0.47  % Processed clauses                    : 2489
% 0.50/0.47  % ...of these trivial                  : 168
% 0.50/0.47  % ...subsumed                          : 1337
% 0.50/0.47  % ...remaining for further processing  : 984
% 0.50/0.47  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 159
% 0.50/0.47  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.50/0.47  % Backward-rewritten                   : 21
% 0.50/0.47  % Generated clauses                    : 8673
% 0.50/0.47  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7357
% 0.50/0.47  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.50/0.47  % Paramodulations                      : 8468
% 0.50/0.47  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.50/0.47  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Equation resolutions                 : 166
% 0.50/0.47  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2672
% 0.50/0.47  % ...of those cached                   : 1974
% 0.50/0.47  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.50/0.47  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.50/0.47  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.50/0.47  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.50/0.47  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.50/0.47  % Current number of processed clauses  : 863
% 0.50/0.47  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 212
% 0.50/0.47  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.50/0.47  %    Negative unit clauses             : 409
% 0.50/0.47  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 239
% 0.50/0.47  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5293
% 0.50/0.47  % ...number of literals in the above   : 10335
% 0.50/0.47  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Current number of archived clauses   : 38
% 0.50/0.47  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15754
% 0.50/0.47  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9053
% 0.50/0.47  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 384
% 0.50/0.47  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17328
% 0.50/0.47  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1063
% 0.50/0.47  % BW rewrite match successes           : 36
% 0.50/0.47  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.50/0.47  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 135254
% 0.50/0.47  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 11361
% 0.50/0.47  
% 0.50/0.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.47  % User time                : 0.144 s
% 0.50/0.47  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.50/0.47  % Total time               : 0.159 s
% 0.50/0.47  % Maximum resident set size: 6240 pages
% 0.50/0.47  
% 0.50/0.47  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.47  % User time                : 0.156 s
% 0.50/0.47  % System time              : 0.021 s
% 0.50/0.47  % Total time               : 0.176 s
% 0.50/0.47  % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 0.50/0.47  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------