↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP063^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:05:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.82s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  17 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  215 (  10   ~;   5   |;   1   &; 198   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   2   ^;  16   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    real: $tType ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    genClo1278781456e_beta: real ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    genClo1015804716orrect: nat > real > $o ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    genClo1163638703lle_te: nat > nat > real ).

thf(decl_32,type,
    abs_abs_real: real > real ).

thf(decl_34,type,
    minus_minus_real: real > real > real ).

thf(decl_35,type,
    one_one_nat: nat ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    plus_plus_nat: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_44,type,
    ord_less_eq_real: real > real > $o ).

thf(decl_45,type,
    i: nat ).

thf(decl_47,type,
    p: nat ).

thf(decl_48,type,
    q: nat ).

thf(fact_119_add_Ocommute,axiom,
    ( plus_plus_nat
    = ( ^ [X98: nat,X99: nat] : ( plus_plus_nat @ X99 @ X98 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.82lvKP1nu3/E---3.1_2566196.p',fact_119_add_Ocommute) ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.82lvKP1nu3/E---3.1_2566196.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_0_rts2b,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( ( genClo1015804716orrect @ X1 @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1 @ X3 ) )
        & ( genClo1015804716orrect @ X2 @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X2 @ X3 ) ) )
     => ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.82lvKP1nu3/E---3.1_2566196.p',fact_0_rts2b) ).

thf(fact_2_corr__q__tq,axiom,
    genClo1015804716orrect @ q @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.82lvKP1nu3/E---3.1_2566196.p',fact_2_corr__q__tq) ).

thf(fact_1_corr__p,axiom,
    genClo1015804716orrect @ p @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.82lvKP1nu3/E---3.1_2566196.p',fact_1_corr__p) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1037: nat,X1038: nat] :
      ( ( plus_plus_nat @ X1037 @ X1038 )
      = ( plus_plus_nat @ X1038 @ X1037 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_119_add_Ocommute])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1255: nat,X1256: nat] :
      ( ( plus_plus_nat @ X1255 @ X1256 )
      = ( plus_plus_nat @ X1256 @ X1255 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1053: nat,X1054: nat,X1055: nat] :
      ( ~ ( genClo1015804716orrect @ X1053 @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1053 @ X1055 ) )
      | ~ ( genClo1015804716orrect @ X1054 @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1054 @ X1055 ) )
      | ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1053 @ X1055 ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1054 @ X1055 ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_0_rts2b])])]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    genClo1015804716orrect @ q @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2_corr__q__tq]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( plus_plus_nat @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( plus_plus_nat @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta )
      | ~ ( genClo1015804716orrect @ X1 @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( genClo1015804716orrect @ X3 @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    genClo1015804716orrect @ q @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ one_one_nat @ i ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    genClo1015804716orrect @ p @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_corr__p]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ i @ one_one_nat ) ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1 @ ( plus_plus_nat @ one_one_nat @ i ) ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ one_one_nat @ i ) ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta )
      | ~ ( genClo1015804716orrect @ X1 @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ X1 @ ( plus_plus_nat @ one_one_nat @ i ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    genClo1015804716orrect @ p @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ one_one_nat @ i ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_real @ ( abs_abs_real @ ( minus_minus_real @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ p @ ( plus_plus_nat @ one_one_nat @ i ) ) @ ( genClo1163638703lle_te @ q @ ( plus_plus_nat @ one_one_nat @ i ) ) ) ) @ genClo1278781456e_beta ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP063^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.17  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:44:36 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.25  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.82lvKP1nu3/E---3.1_2566196.p
% 0.82/0.40  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.82/0.40  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.82/0.40  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting full_lambda_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting full_lambda_9 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % new_ho_10 with pid 2566209 completed with status 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.82/0.40  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.82/0.40  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.82/0.40  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.82/0.40  % Search class: HGUSM-FSLM32-MHFFFFBN
% 0.82/0.40  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting new_ho_10 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting full_lambda_10 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting new_ho_7 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting full_lambda_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % new_ho_10 with pid 2566214 completed with status 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.82/0.40  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNHFA.
% 0.82/0.40  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.82/0.40  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.82/0.40  % Search class: HGUSM-FSLM32-MHFFFFBN
% 0.82/0.40  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Starting new_ho_10 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.82/0.40  % Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.82/0.40  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.82/0.40  
% 0.82/0.40  % Proof found!
% 0.82/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.82/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.82/0.40  % Parsed axioms                        : 366
% 0.82/0.40  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Initial clauses                      : 479
% 0.82/0.40  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 53
% 0.82/0.40  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 426
% 0.82/0.40  % Processed clauses                    : 848
% 0.82/0.40  % ...of these trivial                  : 66
% 0.82/0.40  % ...subsumed                          : 189
% 0.82/0.40  % ...remaining for further processing  : 593
% 0.82/0.40  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 139
% 0.82/0.40  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.82/0.40  % Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.82/0.40  % Generated clauses                    : 3886
% 0.82/0.40  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2992
% 0.82/0.40  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.82/0.40  % Paramodulations                      : 3740
% 0.82/0.40  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.82/0.40  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Equation resolutions                 : 150
% 0.82/0.40  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1982
% 0.82/0.40  % ...of those cached                   : 1469
% 0.82/0.40  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.82/0.40  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.82/0.40  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.82/0.40  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.82/0.40  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.82/0.40  % Current number of processed clauses  : 282
% 0.82/0.40  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 93
% 0.82/0.40  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 0.82/0.40  %    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.82/0.40  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 173
% 0.82/0.40  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2790
% 0.82/0.40  % ...number of literals in the above   : 6235
% 0.82/0.40  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Current number of archived clauses   : 240
% 0.82/0.40  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21210
% 0.82/0.40  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12492
% 0.82/0.40  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 181
% 0.82/0.40  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 200
% 0.82/0.40  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 234
% 0.82/0.40  % BW rewrite match successes           : 163
% 0.82/0.40  % Condensation attempts                : 848
% 0.82/0.40  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.82/0.40  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 65433
% 0.82/0.40  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 6906
% 0.82/0.40  
% 0.82/0.40  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/0.40  % User time                : 0.107 s
% 0.82/0.40  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.82/0.40  % Total time               : 0.117 s
% 0.82/0.40  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.82/0.40  
% 0.82/0.40  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/0.40  % User time                : 0.424 s
% 0.82/0.40  % System time              : 0.043 s
% 0.82/0.40  % Total time               : 0.467 s
% 0.82/0.40  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.82/0.40  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------