↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP066^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.18s 1.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  162 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &; 158   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  14 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0   ^;  34   !;   0   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    tree_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    produc143150363Tree_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_40,type,
    heapIm837449470Leaf_a: tree_a > produc143150363Tree_a ).

thf(decl_48,type,
    t_a: a > tree_a > tree_a > tree_a ).

thf(decl_94,type,
    produc686083979Tree_a: a > tree_a > produc143150363Tree_a ).

thf(decl_98,type,
    product_fst_a_Tree_a: produc143150363Tree_a > a ).

thf(decl_102,type,
    product_snd_a_Tree_a: produc143150363Tree_a > tree_a ).

thf(decl_129,type,
    l1: tree_a ).

thf(decl_130,type,
    l2: tree_a ).

thf(decl_131,type,
    r1: tree_a ).

thf(decl_132,type,
    r2: tree_a ).

thf(decl_135,type,
    t_a2: tree_a ).

thf(decl_136,type,
    v1: a ).

thf(decl_137,type,
    v2: a ).

thf(decl_139,type,
    v_a: a ).

thf(decl_140,type,
    v3: a ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ( v_a
    = ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v1 @ l1 @ r1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WkR9QQqpy1/E---3.1_1501719.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_22_fst__conv,axiom,
    ! [X47: a,X48: tree_a] :
      ( ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( produc686083979Tree_a @ X47 @ X48 ) )
      = X47 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WkR9QQqpy1/E---3.1_1501719.p',fact_22_fst__conv) ).

thf(fact_5_removeLeaf_Osimps_I5_J,axiom,
    ! [X7: a,X8: a,X9: tree_a,X10: tree_a,X11: a,X12: tree_a,X13: tree_a] :
      ( ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X7 @ ( t_a @ X8 @ X9 @ X10 ) @ ( t_a @ X11 @ X12 @ X13 ) ) )
      = ( produc686083979Tree_a @ ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X8 @ X9 @ X10 ) ) ) @ ( t_a @ X7 @ ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X8 @ X9 @ X10 ) ) ) @ ( t_a @ X11 @ X12 @ X13 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WkR9QQqpy1/E---3.1_1501719.p',fact_5_removeLeaf_Osimps_I5_J) ).

thf(fact_0__C4__2_Oprems_C_I1_J,axiom,
    ( ( produc686083979Tree_a @ v_a @ t_a2 )
    = ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v3 @ ( t_a @ v1 @ l1 @ r1 ) @ ( t_a @ v2 @ l2 @ r2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WkR9QQqpy1/E---3.1_1501719.p',fact_0__C4__2_Oprems_C_I1_J) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_a
   != ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v1 @ l1 @ r1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X2151: a,X2152: tree_a] :
      ( ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( produc686083979Tree_a @ X2151 @ X2152 ) )
      = X2151 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_22_fst__conv]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2098: a,X2099: a,X2100: tree_a,X2101: tree_a,X2102: a,X2103: tree_a,X2104: tree_a] :
      ( ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X2098 @ ( t_a @ X2099 @ X2100 @ X2101 ) @ ( t_a @ X2102 @ X2103 @ X2104 ) ) )
      = ( produc686083979Tree_a @ ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X2099 @ X2100 @ X2101 ) ) ) @ ( t_a @ X2098 @ ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X2099 @ X2100 @ X2101 ) ) ) @ ( t_a @ X2102 @ X2103 @ X2104 ) ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_5_removeLeaf_Osimps_I5_J]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_a
   != ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v1 @ l1 @ r1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X2: tree_a,X1: a] :
      ( ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( produc686083979Tree_a @ X1 @ X2 ) )
      = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1: a,X2: tree_a,X3: tree_a,X4: a,X5: tree_a,X7: a,X6: tree_a] :
      ( ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X1 @ ( t_a @ X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ ( t_a @ X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) )
      = ( produc686083979Tree_a @ ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) @ ( t_a @ X1 @ ( product_snd_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) @ ( t_a @ X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_a
   != ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v1 @ l1 @ r1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1: a,X2: tree_a,X7: a,X6: tree_a,X5: tree_a,X4: a,X3: tree_a] :
      ( ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X1 @ ( t_a @ X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) @ ( t_a @ X7 @ X5 @ X6 ) ) ) )
      = ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ X4 @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ( produc686083979Tree_a @ v_a @ t_a2 )
    = ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v3 @ ( t_a @ v1 @ l1 @ r1 ) @ ( t_a @ v2 @ l2 @ r2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0__C4__2_Oprems_C_I1_J]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_a
   != ( product_fst_a_Tree_a @ ( heapIm837449470Leaf_a @ ( t_a @ v1 @ l1 @ r1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_8]),c_0_13]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : ITP066^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:47:04 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.29  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.WkR9QQqpy1/E---3.1_1501719.p
% 8.18/1.48  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 8.18/1.48  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHFA.
% 8.18/1.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting additional_ho_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting full_lambda_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % new_ho_11 with pid 1501732 completed with status 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Result found by new_ho_11
% 8.18/1.48  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHFA.
% 8.18/1.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.18/1.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.18/1.48  % Search class: HGHSM-FMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 8.18/1.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_ho_11 with 151s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_bool_2 with 136s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % new_ho_11 with pid 1501739 completed with status 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Result found by new_ho_11
% 8.18/1.48  % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSLNHFA.
% 8.18/1.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_ho_11 with 1500s (5) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 8.18/1.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 8.18/1.48  % Search class: HGHSM-FMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 8.18/1.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Starting new_ho_11 with 151s (1) cores
% 8.18/1.48  % Preprocessing time       : 0.025 s
% 8.18/1.48  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.18/1.48  
% 8.18/1.48  % Proof found!
% 8.18/1.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 8.18/1.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.18/1.48  % Parsed axioms                        : 507
% 8.18/1.48  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Initial clauses                      : 1137
% 8.18/1.48  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 192
% 8.18/1.48  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 945
% 8.18/1.48  % Processed clauses                    : 2984
% 8.18/1.48  % ...of these trivial                  : 76
% 8.18/1.48  % ...subsumed                          : 876
% 8.18/1.48  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2032
% 8.18/1.48  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 394
% 8.18/1.48  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Backward-subsumed                    : 15
% 8.18/1.48  % Backward-rewritten                   : 42
% 8.18/1.48  % Generated clauses                    : 7880
% 8.18/1.48  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6891
% 8.18/1.48  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Paramodulations                      : 7370
% 8.18/1.48  % Factorizations                       : 68
% 8.18/1.48  % NegExts                              : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Equation resolutions                 : 429
% 8.18/1.48  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3424
% 8.18/1.48  % ...of those cached                   : 2921
% 8.18/1.48  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 8.18/1.48  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 8.18/1.48  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 8.18/1.48  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 8.18/1.48  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 8.18/1.48  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1177
% 8.18/1.48  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 190
% 8.18/1.48  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 8.18/1.48  %    Negative unit clauses             : 108
% 8.18/1.48  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 875
% 8.18/1.48  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5353
% 8.18/1.48  % ...number of literals in the above   : 21463
% 8.18/1.48  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Current number of archived clauses   : 789
% 8.18/1.48  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 619406
% 8.18/1.48  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58528
% 8.18/1.48  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 363
% 8.18/1.48  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13080
% 8.18/1.48  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 212
% 8.18/1.48  % BW rewrite match successes           : 109
% 8.18/1.48  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 8.18/1.48  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 274562
% 8.18/1.48  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 19462
% 8.18/1.48  
% 8.18/1.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.18/1.48  % User time                : 0.961 s
% 8.18/1.48  % System time              : 0.038 s
% 8.18/1.48  % Total time               : 0.999 s
% 8.18/1.48  % Maximum resident set size: 8896 pages
% 8.18/1.48  
% 8.18/1.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 8.18/1.48  % User time                : 4.910 s
% 8.18/1.48  % System time              : 0.154 s
% 8.18/1.48  % Total time               : 5.065 s
% 8.18/1.48  % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 8.18/1.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------