↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP072^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.32s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   7 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (  22 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  123 (  22   ~;  14   |;   4   &;  75   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0   ^;  29   !;   0   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    hF_Mirabelle_hf: $tType ).

thf(decl_38,type,
    zero_z189798548lle_hf: hF_Mirabelle_hf ).

thf(decl_43,type,
    hF_Mirabelle_hinsert: hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf ).

thf(decl_44,type,
    hF_Mirabelle_hmem: hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf > $o ).

thf(decl_80,type,
    z: hF_Mirabelle_hf ).

thf(decl_82,type,
    esk2_1: hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf ).

thf(decl_83,type,
    esk3_1: hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf ).

thf(decl_253,type,
    esk173_0: hF_Mirabelle_hf ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ( ( z = zero_z189798548lle_hf )
  <=> ! [X5: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
        ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X5 @ z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SdicyvxzQh/E---3.1_2974618.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_4_hmem__hinsert,axiom,
    ! [X6: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X10: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X11: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X6 @ ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X10 @ X11 ) )
    <=> ( ( X6 = X10 )
        | ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X6 @ X11 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SdicyvxzQh/E---3.1_2974618.p',fact_4_hmem__hinsert) ).

thf(fact_3_hf__cases,axiom,
    ! [X7: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( X7 != zero_z189798548lle_hf )
     => ~ ! [X8: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X9: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
            ( ( X7
              = ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X8 @ X9 ) )
           => ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X8 @ X9 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SdicyvxzQh/E---3.1_2974618.p',fact_3_hf__cases) ).

thf(fact_1_hemptyE,axiom,
    ! [X6: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X6 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SdicyvxzQh/E---3.1_2974618.p',fact_1_hemptyE) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( z = zero_z189798548lle_hf )
    <=> ! [X5: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
          ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X5 @ z ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1553: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X1554: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X1555: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1553 @ ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1554 @ X1555 ) )
        | ( X1553 = X1554 )
        | ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1553 @ X1555 ) )
      & ( ( X1553 != X1554 )
        | ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1553 @ ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1554 @ X1555 ) ) )
      & ( ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1553 @ X1555 )
        | ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1553 @ ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1554 @ X1555 ) ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_4_hmem__hinsert])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X7: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( X7 != zero_z189798548lle_hf )
     => ~ ! [X8: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X9: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
            ( ( X7
              = ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X8 @ X9 ) )
           => ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X8 @ X9 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_3_hf__cases]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( z = zero_z189798548lle_hf )
    <=> ! [X5: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
          ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X5 @ z ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X3: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X2: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1 @ ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X1 != X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1550: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( ( X1550
          = ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ ( esk2_1 @ X1550 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X1550 ) ) )
        | ( X1550 = zero_z189798548lle_hf ) )
      & ( ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ ( esk2_1 @ X1550 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X1550 ) )
        | ( X1550 = zero_z189798548lle_hf ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2527: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( ( z != zero_z189798548lle_hf )
        | ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ esk173_0 @ z ) )
      & ( ( z = zero_z189798548lle_hf )
        | ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X2527 @ z ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1: hF_Mirabelle_hf,X2: hF_Mirabelle_hf] : ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1 @ ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( X1
        = ( hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ ( esk2_1 @ X1 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ( X1 = zero_z189798548lle_hf ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X6: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X6 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1_hemptyE]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( z = zero_z189798548lle_hf )
      | ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1 @ z ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ( ( X1 = zero_z189798548lle_hf )
      | ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ ( esk2_1 @ X1 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1548: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1548 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ esk173_0 @ z )
    | ( z != zero_z189798548lle_hf ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    z = zero_z189798548lle_hf,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: hF_Mirabelle_hf] :
      ~ ( hF_Mirabelle_hmem @ X1 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_18])]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP072^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.17  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:48:58 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.06/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.SdicyvxzQh/E---3.1_2974618.p
% 0.20/0.32  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.20/0.32  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNHFA.
% 0.20/0.32  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting sh7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting pre_casc_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % pre_casc_7 with pid 2974634 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Result found by pre_casc_7
% 0.20/0.32  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNHFA.
% 0.20/0.32  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting sh7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting pre_casc_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.32  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.32  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBN
% 0.20/0.32  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2974635 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.32  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNHFA.
% 0.20/0.32  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting sh7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting pre_casc_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.32  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.32  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBN
% 0.20/0.32  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.32  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.32  % Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.32  
% 0.20/0.32  % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.32  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.32  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.32  % Parsed axioms                        : 415
% 0.20/0.32  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Initial clauses                      : 875
% 0.20/0.32  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 87
% 0.20/0.32  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 788
% 0.20/0.32  % Processed clauses                    : 357
% 0.20/0.32  % ...of these trivial                  : 7
% 0.20/0.32  % ...subsumed                          : 113
% 0.20/0.32  % ...remaining for further processing  : 237
% 0.20/0.32  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 66
% 0.20/0.32  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.20/0.32  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.20/0.32  % Generated clauses                    : 293
% 0.20/0.32  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 164
% 0.20/0.32  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.20/0.32  % Paramodulations                      : 217
% 0.20/0.32  % Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.20/0.32  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Equation resolutions                 : 66
% 0.20/0.32  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Total rewrite steps                  : 131
% 0.20/0.32  % ...of those cached                   : 98
% 0.20/0.32  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.32  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.32  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.32  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.32  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.32  % Current number of processed clauses  : 174
% 0.20/0.32  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 46
% 0.20/0.32  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.32  %    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 0.20/0.32  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 113
% 0.20/0.32  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 595
% 0.20/0.32  % ...number of literals in the above   : 2068
% 0.20/0.32  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.20/0.32  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1700
% 0.20/0.32  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1553
% 0.20/0.32  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 61
% 0.20/0.32  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 208
% 0.20/0.32  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 0.20/0.32  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.20/0.32  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.32  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 62035
% 0.20/0.32  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 18210
% 0.20/0.32  
% 0.20/0.32  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.32  % User time                : 0.041 s
% 0.20/0.32  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.32  % Total time               : 0.053 s
% 0.20/0.32  % Maximum resident set size: 7412 pages
% 0.20/0.32  
% 0.20/0.32  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.32  % User time                : 0.055 s
% 0.20/0.32  % System time              : 0.018 s
% 0.20/0.32  % Total time               : 0.073 s
% 0.20/0.32  % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.20/0.32  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------