↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP088^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:05:29 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.74s 0.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  19 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   47 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  171 (  28   ~;  15   |;   0   &; 123   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    6 (   5 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0   ^;  22   !;   0   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    secrecy_specID: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    secrecy_KS: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    set_Secrecy_specID: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    secrecy_Expression: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort5,type,
    secrecy_Keys: $tType ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o ).

thf(decl_41,type,
    bot_bo1785112429specID: set_Secrecy_specID ).

thf(decl_47,type,
    ine: secrecy_specID > secrecy_Expression > $o ).

thf(decl_59,type,
    secrecy_kE: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_Expression ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    secrecy_kKS: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_KS ).

thf(decl_73,type,
    insert1671894227specID: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID ).

thf(decl_81,type,
    correctCompositionIn: secrecy_specID > $o ).

thf(decl_90,type,
    subcomponents: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_specID ).

thf(decl_96,type,
    p: secrecy_specID ).

thf(decl_97,type,
    pq: secrecy_specID ).

thf(decl_98,type,
    q: secrecy_specID ).

thf(decl_99,type,
    key: secrecy_Keys ).

thf(fact_2_assms_I1_J,axiom,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ p @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p',fact_2_assms_I1_J) ).

thf(fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine,axiom,
    ! [X3: secrecy_specID,X4: secrecy_Keys] :
      ( ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ X3 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) )
     => ~ ( ine @ X3 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p',fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine) ).

thf(fact_1_assms_I2_J,axiom,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p',fact_1_assms_I2_J) ).

thf(fact_35_TBtheorem1a,axiom,
    ! [X22: secrecy_specID,X9: secrecy_Expression,X7: secrecy_specID,X12: secrecy_specID] :
      ( ( ine @ X22 @ X9 )
     => ( ( ( subcomponents @ X22 )
          = ( insert1671894227specID @ X7 @ ( insert1671894227specID @ X12 @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) )
       => ( ( correctCompositionIn @ X22 )
         => ( ( ine @ X7 @ X9 )
            | ( ine @ X12 @ X9 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p',fact_35_TBtheorem1a) ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ~ ( ine @ pq @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_3_assms_I3_J,axiom,
    ( ( subcomponents @ pq )
    = ( insert1671894227specID @ p @ ( insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p',fact_3_assms_I3_J) ).

thf(fact_0_assms_I4_J,axiom,
    correctCompositionIn @ pq,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p',fact_0_assms_I4_J) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ p @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_assms_I1_J]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3: secrecy_specID,X4: secrecy_Keys] :
      ( ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ X3 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) )
     => ~ ( ine @ X3 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X4 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_5_not__know__k__not__ine]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_1_assms_I2_J]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1488: secrecy_specID,X1489: secrecy_Expression,X1490: secrecy_specID,X1491: secrecy_specID] :
      ( ~ ( ine @ X1488 @ X1489 )
      | ( ( subcomponents @ X1488 )
       != ( insert1671894227specID @ X1490 @ ( insert1671894227specID @ X1491 @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) )
      | ~ ( correctCompositionIn @ X1488 )
      | ( ine @ X1490 @ X1489 )
      | ( ine @ X1491 @ X1489 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_35_TBtheorem1a])])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ine @ pq @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ p @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1457: secrecy_specID,X1458: secrecy_Keys] :
      ( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X1457 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X1458 ) )
      | ~ ( ine @ X1457 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X1458 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X9: secrecy_Expression,X7: secrecy_specID,X5: secrecy_specID,X3: secrecy_specID] :
      ( ( ine @ X5 @ X9 )
      | ( ine @ X7 @ X9 )
      | ~ ( ine @ X3 @ X9 )
      | ( ( subcomponents @ X3 )
       != ( insert1671894227specID @ X5 @ ( insert1671894227specID @ X7 @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) )
      | ~ ( correctCompositionIn @ X3 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ( subcomponents @ pq )
    = ( insert1671894227specID @ p @ ( insert1671894227specID @ q @ bot_bo1785112429specID ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3_assms_I3_J]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ine @ pq @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ p @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X3: secrecy_specID,X1: secrecy_Keys] :
      ( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X3 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( ine @ X3 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X9: secrecy_Expression,X3: secrecy_specID] :
      ( ( ine @ p @ X9 )
      | ( ine @ q @ X9 )
      | ( ( subcomponents @ X3 )
       != ( subcomponents @ pq ) )
      | ~ ( ine @ X3 @ X9 )
      | ~ ( correctCompositionIn @ X3 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ine @ pq @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    correctCompositionIn @ pq,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_assms_I4_J]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ~ ( ine @ p @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ ( ine @ q @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP088^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.19  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:54:37 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.30  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XharMbfsxF/E---3.1_4028582.p
% 3.74/0.83  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 3.74/0.83  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
% 3.74/0.83  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting pre_casc_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting additional_ho_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting lpo8_s with 300s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % new_ho_3 with pid 4028595 completed with status 0
% 3.74/0.83  % Result found by new_ho_3
% 3.74/0.83  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
% 3.74/0.83  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 3.74/0.83  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 3.74/0.83  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-SSFFFFBN
% 3.74/0.83  % partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN
% 3.74/0.83  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting new_ho_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting additional_ho_5 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting new_bool_4 with 136s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % new_ho_3 with pid 4028603 completed with status 0
% 3.74/0.83  % Result found by new_ho_3
% 3.74/0.83  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
% 3.74/0.83  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 3.74/0.83  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 3.74/0.83  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLS32-SSFFFFBN
% 3.74/0.83  % partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFFBN
% 3.74/0.83  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Starting new_ho_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 3.74/0.83  % Preprocessing time       : 0.012 s
% 3.74/0.83  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 3.74/0.83  
% 3.74/0.83  % Proof found!
% 3.74/0.83  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.74/0.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.74/0.83  % Parsed axioms                        : 446
% 3.74/0.83  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 143
% 3.74/0.83  % Initial clauses                      : 625
% 3.74/0.83  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 27
% 3.74/0.83  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 598
% 3.74/0.83  % Processed clauses                    : 2908
% 3.74/0.83  % ...of these trivial                  : 71
% 3.74/0.83  % ...subsumed                          : 1616
% 3.74/0.83  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1221
% 3.74/0.83  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 237
% 3.74/0.83  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 3.74/0.83  % Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 3.74/0.83  % Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 3.74/0.83  % Generated clauses                    : 9578
% 3.74/0.83  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8543
% 3.74/0.83  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 3.74/0.83  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 24
% 3.74/0.83  % Paramodulations                      : 9356
% 3.74/0.83  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 3.74/0.83  % NegExts                              : 0
% 3.74/0.83  % Equation resolutions                 : 258
% 3.74/0.83  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 3.74/0.83  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3146
% 3.74/0.83  % ...of those cached                   : 2676
% 3.74/0.83  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 3.74/0.83  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 3.74/0.83  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 3.74/0.83  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 3.74/0.83  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 3.74/0.83  % Current number of processed clauses  : 740
% 3.74/0.83  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 74
% 3.74/0.83  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 3.74/0.83  %    Negative unit clauses             : 21
% 3.74/0.83  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 636
% 3.74/0.83  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6567
% 3.74/0.83  % ...number of literals in the above   : 24254
% 3.74/0.83  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 3.74/0.83  % Current number of archived clauses   : 399
% 3.74/0.83  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 162081
% 3.74/0.83  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57937
% 3.74/0.83  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1393
% 3.74/0.83  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 721
% 3.74/0.83  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 3.74/0.83  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 178
% 3.74/0.83  % BW rewrite match successes           : 128
% 3.74/0.83  % Condensation attempts                : 2908
% 3.74/0.83  % Condensation successes               : 6
% 3.74/0.83  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 184586
% 3.74/0.83  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 16452
% 3.74/0.83  
% 3.74/0.83  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.74/0.83  % User time                : 0.432 s
% 3.74/0.83  % System time              : 0.018 s
% 3.74/0.83  % Total time               : 0.450 s
% 3.74/0.83  % Maximum resident set size: 7104 pages
% 3.74/0.83  
% 3.74/0.83  % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.74/0.83  % User time                : 2.106 s
% 3.74/0.83  % System time              : 0.101 s
% 3.74/0.83  % Total time               : 2.208 s
% 3.74/0.83  % Maximum resident set size: 5632 pages
% 3.74/0.83  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------