%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP128^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:26 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.32s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 7 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 2 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 ^; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
c: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(decl_204,type,
finite746615251te_a_c: ( a > c > c ) > $o ).
thf(decl_380,type,
f1: a > c > c ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
finite746615251te_a_c @ f1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtH3puiSqD/E---3.1_2133951.p',conj_0) ).
thf(fact_0_assms_I2_J,axiom,
finite746615251te_a_c @ f1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtH3puiSqD/E---3.1_2133951.p',fact_0_assms_I2_J) ).
thf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( finite746615251te_a_c @ f1 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( finite746615251te_a_c @ f1 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( finite746615251te_a_c @ f1 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( finite746615251te_a_c @ f1 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
finite746615251te_a_c @ f1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0_assms_I2_J]) ).
thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ITP128^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.18 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.19 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 19:57:31 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.22 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.UtH3puiSqD/E---3.1_2133951.p
% 0.32/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.32/0.42 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLNHSA.
% 0.32/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting additional_ho_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting full_lambda_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % full_lambda_7 with pid 2133967 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Result found by full_lambda_7
% 0.32/0.42 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLNHSA.
% 0.32/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting additional_ho_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting full_lambda_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.32/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.32/0.42 % Search class: HGUSM-FFMM32-DHSFFSNN
% 0.32/0.42 % partial match(3): HGUSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 0.32/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2133968 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.32/0.42 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSSSSLNHSA.
% 0.32/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting additional_ho_4 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting full_lambda_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.32/0.42 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,2.5,,3,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.32/0.42 % Search class: HGUSM-FFMM32-DHSFFSNN
% 0.32/0.42 % partial match(3): HGUSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 0.32/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.32/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.32/0.42
% 0.32/0.42 % Proof found!
% 0.32/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.32/0.42 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 735
% 0.32/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 690
% 0.32/0.42 % Initial clauses : 48
% 0.32/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 48
% 0.32/0.42 % Processed clauses : 2
% 0.32/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 1
% 0.32/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.32/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 1
% 0.32/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.32/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 46
% 0.32/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 87
% 0.32/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.32/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11322
% 0.32/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 6293
% 0.32/0.42
% 0.32/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.42 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.32/0.42 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.32/0.42 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.32/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 6432 pages
% 0.32/0.42
% 0.32/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.42 % User time : 0.038 s
% 0.32/0.42 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.32/0.42 % Total time : 0.053 s
% 0.32/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 6400 pages
% 0.32/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------