↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP151^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.11s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  18 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  31 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  100 (  23   ~;  10   |;   1   &;  62   @)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   0   ^;  24   !;   1   ?;  25   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    int: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    polyno727731844poly_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    zero_zero_int: int ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    zero_zero_nat: nat ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    semiri2019852685at_int: nat > int ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_34,type,
    polyno578545843gree_a: polyno727731844poly_a > nat ).

thf(decl_37,type,
    polyno1372495879olyh_a: polyno727731844poly_a > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_40,type,
    n: nat ).

thf(decl_41,type,
    p: polyno727731844poly_a ).

thf(decl_45,type,
    esk4_1: nat > nat ).

thf(decl_74,type,
    esk33_1: nat > nat ).

thf(fact_55_of__nat__neq__0,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ ( suc @ X1 ) )
     != zero_zero_int ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',fact_55_of__nat__neq__0) ).

thf(fact_56_polypow_Ocases,axiom,
    ! [X7: nat] :
      ( ( X7 != zero_zero_nat )
     => ~ ! [X23: nat] :
            ( X7
           != ( suc @ X23 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',fact_56_polypow_Ocases) ).

thf(conj_2,conjecture,
    ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ p )
    = zero_zero_nat ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',conj_2) ).

thf(fact_98_gr0__conv__Suc,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X1 )
    <=> ? [X42: nat] :
          ( X1
          = ( suc @ X42 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',fact_98_gr0__conv__Suc) ).

thf(fact_31_degree__isnpolyh__Suc,axiom,
    ! [X13: polyno727731844poly_a,X1: nat] :
      ( ( polyno1372495879olyh_a @ X13 @ ( suc @ X1 ) )
     => ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ X13 )
        = zero_zero_nat ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',fact_31_degree__isnpolyh__Suc) ).

thf(conj_0,hypothesis,
    ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ n,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',conj_0) ).

thf(conj_1,hypothesis,
    polyno1372495879olyh_a @ p @ n,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',conj_1) ).

thf(fact_43_of__nat__0,axiom,
    ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ zero_zero_nat )
    = zero_zero_int ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p',fact_43_of__nat__0) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ ( suc @ X1 ) )
     != zero_zero_int ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_55_of__nat__neq__0]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X7: nat] :
      ( ( X7 != zero_zero_nat )
     => ~ ! [X23: nat] :
            ( X7
           != ( suc @ X23 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_56_polypow_Ocases]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ p )
   != zero_zero_nat ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_2]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1344: nat] :
      ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ ( suc @ X1344 ) )
     != zero_zero_int ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1474: nat,X1476: nat,X1477: nat] :
      ( ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X1474 )
        | ( X1474
          = ( suc @ ( esk33_1 @ X1474 ) ) ) )
      & ( ( X1476
         != ( suc @ X1477 ) )
        | ( ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X1476 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_98_gr0__conv__Suc])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1311: polyno727731844poly_a,X1312: nat] :
      ( ~ ( polyno1372495879olyh_a @ X1311 @ ( suc @ X1312 ) )
      | ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ X1311 )
        = zero_zero_nat ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_31_degree__isnpolyh__Suc])])]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1345: nat] :
      ( ( X1345 = zero_zero_nat )
      | ( X1345
        = ( suc @ ( esk4_1 @ X1345 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

thf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ p )
   != zero_zero_nat ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ ( suc @ X1 ) )
     != zero_zero_int ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( X1
        = ( suc @ ( esk33_1 @ X1 ) ) )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X12: polyno727731844poly_a,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ X12 )
        = zero_zero_nat )
      | ~ ( polyno1372495879olyh_a @ X12 @ ( suc @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( X1 = zero_zero_nat )
      | ( X1
        = ( suc @ ( esk4_1 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ p )
   != zero_zero_nat ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ X1 )
       != zero_zero_int )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ord_less_nat @ zero_zero_nat @ n,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X12: polyno727731844poly_a,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ X12 )
        = zero_zero_nat )
      | ( X1 = zero_zero_nat )
      | ~ ( polyno1372495879olyh_a @ X12 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    polyno1372495879olyh_a @ p @ n,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( polyno578545843gree_a @ p )
   != zero_zero_nat ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ n )
   != zero_zero_int ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    n = zero_zero_nat,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ( semiri2019852685at_int @ zero_zero_nat )
    = zero_zero_int ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_43_of__nat__0]) ).

thf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP151^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.19  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:04:52 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.24  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.28  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ykrkiHCEqq/E---3.1_1783062.p
% 1.11/0.48  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 1.11/0.48  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHFA.
% 1.11/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting sh10 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting lpo5_rw_fix with 300s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % new_ho_10 with pid 1783102 completed with status 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 1.11/0.48  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHFA.
% 1.11/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.11/0.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.11/0.48  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBC
% 1.11/0.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting new_ho_10 with 151s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting new_ho_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting sh3 with 136s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % new_ho_10 with pid 1783121 completed with status 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 1.11/0.48  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNHFA.
% 1.11/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.11/0.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.11/0.48  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MHFFFSBC
% 1.11/0.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Starting new_ho_10 with 151s (1) cores
% 1.11/0.48  % Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 1.11/0.48  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.11/0.48  
% 1.11/0.48  % Proof found!
% 1.11/0.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.11/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.11/0.48  % Parsed axioms                        : 373
% 1.11/0.48  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Initial clauses                      : 712
% 1.11/0.48  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 47
% 1.11/0.48  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 665
% 1.11/0.48  % Processed clauses                    : 1306
% 1.11/0.48  % ...of these trivial                  : 23
% 1.11/0.48  % ...subsumed                          : 448
% 1.11/0.48  % ...remaining for further processing  : 835
% 1.11/0.48  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 147
% 1.11/0.48  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 1.11/0.48  % Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 1.11/0.48  % Generated clauses                    : 4268
% 1.11/0.48  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3723
% 1.11/0.48  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 1.11/0.48  % Paramodulations                      : 4099
% 1.11/0.48  % Factorizations                       : 12
% 1.11/0.48  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Equation resolutions                 : 157
% 1.11/0.48  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1069
% 1.11/0.48  % ...of those cached                   : 836
% 1.11/0.48  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.11/0.48  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.11/0.48  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.11/0.48  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.11/0.48  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.11/0.48  % Current number of processed clauses  : 380
% 1.11/0.48  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 43
% 1.11/0.48  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 1.11/0.48  %    Negative unit clauses             : 25
% 1.11/0.48  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 311
% 1.11/0.48  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3405
% 1.11/0.48  % ...number of literals in the above   : 11431
% 1.11/0.48  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.11/0.48  % Current number of archived clauses   : 354
% 1.11/0.48  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 34713
% 1.11/0.48  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21247
% 1.11/0.48  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 331
% 1.11/0.48  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1194
% 1.11/0.48  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.11/0.48  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 26
% 1.11/0.48  % BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 1.11/0.48  % Condensation attempts                : 1306
% 1.11/0.48  % Condensation successes               : 28
% 1.11/0.48  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 132303
% 1.11/0.48  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 14211
% 1.11/0.48  
% 1.11/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.11/0.48  % User time                : 0.151 s
% 1.11/0.48  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 1.11/0.48  % Total time               : 0.162 s
% 1.11/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 6540 pages
% 1.11/0.48  
% 1.11/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.11/0.48  % User time                : 0.536 s
% 1.11/0.48  % System time              : 0.044 s
% 1.11/0.48  % Total time               : 0.580 s
% 1.11/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 1.11/0.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------