↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP155^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:05:41 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.46s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (   6 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  224 (  15   ~;  14   |;   0   &; 191   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    5 (   4 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0   ^;  18   !;   0   ?;  18   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    set_Product_prod_a_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    set_a: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort4,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    finite_card_a: set_a > nat ).

thf(decl_31,type,
    finite_finite_a: set_a > $o ).

thf(decl_46,type,
    ord_less_eq_nat: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_53,type,
    ord_less_eq_set_a: set_a > set_a > $o ).

thf(decl_62,type,
    prefer1676310729than_a: a > set_a > set_Product_prod_a_a > set_a ).

thf(decl_92,type,
    member_a: a > set_a > $o ).

thf(decl_93,type,
    carrier: set_a ).

thf(decl_94,type,
    relation: set_Product_prod_a_a ).

thf(decl_95,type,
    x: a ).

thf(decl_96,type,
    y: a ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_211_card__seteq,axiom,
    ! [X372: set_a,X82: set_a] :
      ( ( finite_finite_a @ X372 )
     => ( ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ X82 @ X372 )
       => ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ ( finite_card_a @ X372 ) @ ( finite_card_a @ X82 ) )
         => ( X82 = X372 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p',fact_211_card__seteq) ).

thf(fact_3__092_060open_062card_A_Ino__better__than_Ax_Acarrier_Arelation_J_A_092_060le_062_Acard_A_Ino__better__than_Ay_Acarrier_Arelation_J_092_060close_062,axiom,
    ord_less_eq_nat @ ( finite_card_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) ) @ ( finite_card_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p',fact_3__092_060open_062card_A_Ino__better__than_Ax_Acarrier_Arelation_J_A_092_060le_062_Acard_A_Ino__better__than_Ay_Acarrier_Arelation_J_092_060close_062) ).

thf(fact_4_nbt__nest,axiom,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X2 @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1 @ carrier @ relation ) )
      | ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1 @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X2 @ carrier @ relation ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p',fact_4_nbt__nest) ).

thf(fact_15_fnt__carrier__fnt__nbt,axiom,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( member_a @ X3 @ carrier )
     => ( finite_finite_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X3 @ carrier @ relation ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p',fact_15_fnt__carrier__fnt__nbt) ).

thf(fact_1_assms_I1_J,axiom,
    member_a @ x @ carrier,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p',fact_1_assms_I1_J) ).

thf(fact_154_subset__refl,axiom,
    ! [X82: set_a] : ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ X82 @ X82 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p',fact_154_subset__refl) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1933: set_a,X1934: set_a] :
      ( ~ ( finite_finite_a @ X1933 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ X1934 @ X1933 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_eq_nat @ ( finite_card_a @ X1933 ) @ ( finite_card_a @ X1934 ) )
      | ( X1934 = X1933 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_211_card__seteq])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X6: set_a,X18: set_a] :
      ( ( X18 = X6 )
      | ~ ( finite_finite_a @ X6 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ X18 @ X6 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_eq_nat @ ( finite_card_a @ X6 ) @ ( finite_card_a @ X18 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ord_less_eq_nat @ ( finite_card_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) ) @ ( finite_card_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_3__092_060open_062card_A_Ino__better__than_Ax_Acarrier_Arelation_J_A_092_060le_062_Acard_A_Ino__better__than_Ay_Acarrier_Arelation_J_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1624: a,X1625: a] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1624 @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1625 @ carrier @ relation ) )
      | ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1625 @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1624 @ carrier @ relation ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_4_nbt__nest]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ( ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation )
      = ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) )
    | ~ ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) )
    | ~ ( finite_finite_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2: a,X1: a] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1 @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X2 @ carrier @ relation ) )
      | ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X2 @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1 @ carrier @ relation ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1808: a] :
      ( ~ ( member_a @ X1808 @ carrier )
      | ( finite_finite_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1808 @ carrier @ relation ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_15_fnt__carrier__fnt__nbt])])]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ( ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation )
      = ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) )
    | ~ ( finite_finite_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: a] :
      ( ( finite_finite_a @ ( prefer1676310729than_a @ X1 @ carrier @ relation ) )
      | ~ ( member_a @ X1 @ carrier ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    member_a @ x @ carrier,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_assms_I1_J]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1683: set_a] : ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ X1683 @ X1683 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_154_subset__refl]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ( prefer1676310729than_a @ y @ carrier @ relation )
    = ( prefer1676310729than_a @ x @ carrier @ relation ) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X6: set_a] : ( ord_less_eq_set_a @ X6 @ X6 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP155^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.17  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:02:37 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.27  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.7ZoXeW07rM/E---3.1_1773230.p
% 0.46/0.46  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.46/0.46  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
% 0.46/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting pre_casc_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting additional_ho_7 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting lpo8_s with 300s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % new_ho_3 with pid 1773280 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.46  % Result found by new_ho_3
% 0.46/0.46  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
% 0.46/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.46/0.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.46/0.46  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFSBN
% 0.46/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting new_ho_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting new_bool_9 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting lpo1_def_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % new_ho_3 with pid 1773300 completed with status 0
% 0.46/0.46  % Result found by new_ho_3
% 0.46/0.46  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSMNSFA.
% 0.46/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting new_ho_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true))
% 0.46/0.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
% 0.46/0.46  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-SSFFFSBN
% 0.46/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Starting new_ho_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.46/0.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 0.46/0.46  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.46/0.46  
% 0.46/0.46  % Proof found!
% 0.46/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.46/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.46/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 443
% 0.46/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 140
% 0.46/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 675
% 0.46/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 21
% 0.46/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 654
% 0.46/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 873
% 0.46/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 0.46/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 196
% 0.46/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 667
% 0.46/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 65
% 0.46/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.46/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.46/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 6
% 0.46/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 293
% 0.46/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 189
% 0.46/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.46/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 8
% 0.46/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 206
% 0.46/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.46/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.46/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 67
% 0.46/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.46/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 120
% 0.46/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 77
% 0.46/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.46/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.46/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.46/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.46/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.46/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 151
% 0.46/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 34
% 0.46/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.46/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.46/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 110
% 0.46/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 409
% 0.46/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1512
% 0.46/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.46/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 461
% 0.46/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 56814
% 0.46/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18934
% 0.46/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 195
% 0.46/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 298
% 0.46/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.46/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8
% 0.46/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.46/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 873
% 0.46/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 16
% 0.46/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 77179
% 0.46/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 17394
% 0.46/0.46  
% 0.46/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.46  % User time                : 0.147 s
% 0.46/0.46  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.46/0.46  % Total time               : 0.156 s
% 0.46/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 7208 pages
% 0.46/0.46  
% 0.46/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.46/0.46  % User time                : 0.473 s
% 0.46/0.46  % System time              : 0.054 s
% 0.46/0.46  % Total time               : 0.527 s
% 0.46/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.46/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------