%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP158^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:32 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.27s 1.01s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 11 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 76 ( 4 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 344 ( 26 ~; 19 |; 3 &; 288 @)
% ( 1 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 8 avg)
% Number of types : 10 ( 9 usr)
% Number of type conns : 19 ( 19 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 24 ( 22 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 47 ( 1 ^; 44 !; 2 ?; 47 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
list_P796095576elle_U: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
list_nat: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort3,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort4,type,
list_P512754263e_form: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort5,type,
prover1687215943e_form: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort6,type,
set_nat: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort7,type,
set_Pr619177522elle_U: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort8,type,
produc227817602le_U_o: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort9,type,
prover_Mirabelle_U: $tType ).
thf(decl_29,type,
append1038020460e_form: list_P512754263e_form > list_P512754263e_form > list_P512754263e_form ).
thf(decl_53,type,
cons_P1475164433e_form: prover1687215943e_form > list_P512754263e_form > list_P512754263e_form ).
thf(decl_59,type,
nil_Pr1384483009e_form: list_P512754263e_form ).
thf(decl_63,type,
set_nat2: list_nat > set_nat ).
thf(decl_95,type,
produc1069574002le_U_o: set_Pr619177522elle_U > ( nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o ) > produc227817602le_U_o ).
thf(decl_96,type,
prover1282070756_SEval: produc227817602le_U_o > ( nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ) > list_P512754263e_form > $o ).
thf(decl_97,type,
prover1539709396Svalid: list_P512754263e_form > $o ).
thf(decl_98,type,
prover1577896257_finst: prover1687215943e_form > nat > prover1687215943e_form ).
thf(decl_101,type,
prover571163162e_FAll: prover1687215943e_form > prover1687215943e_form ).
thf(decl_103,type,
prover1847600056is_env: produc227817602le_U_o > ( nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ) > $o ).
thf(decl_106,type,
prover_Mirabelle_sfv: list_P512754263e_form > list_nat ).
thf(decl_114,type,
member_nat: nat > set_nat > $o ).
thf(decl_126,type,
a: set_Pr619177522elle_U ).
thf(decl_127,type,
b: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o ).
thf(decl_128,type,
f: prover1687215943e_form ).
thf(decl_129,type,
s: list_P512754263e_form ).
thf(decl_130,type,
u: nat ).
thf(decl_132,type,
esk2_1: list_P512754263e_form > produc227817602le_U_o ).
thf(decl_133,type,
esk3_1: list_P512754263e_form > nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ).
thf(decl_440,type,
esk290_1: produc227817602le_U_o > set_Pr619177522elle_U ).
thf(decl_441,type,
epred21_1: produc227817602le_U_o > nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o ).
thf(decl_587,type,
esk429_0: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U ).
thf(conj_2,conjecture,
! [X870: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 )
| ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3i5YOFtziZ/E---3.1_3144207.p',conj_2) ).
thf(fact_23_Svalid__def,axiom,
( prover1539709396Svalid
= ( ^ [X34: list_P512754263e_form] :
! [X35: produc227817602le_U_o,X36: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ( prover1847600056is_env @ X35 @ X36 )
=> ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X35 @ X36 @ X34 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3i5YOFtziZ/E---3.1_3144207.p',fact_23_Svalid__def) ).
thf(conj_1,hypothesis,
! [X867: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X868: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o,X869: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X867 @ X868 ) @ X869 )
=> ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X867 @ X868 ) @ X869 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3i5YOFtziZ/E---3.1_3144207.p',conj_1) ).
thf(fact_193_surj__pair,axiom,
! [X472: produc227817602le_U_o] :
? [X473: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X474: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o] :
( X472
= ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X473 @ X474 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3i5YOFtziZ/E---3.1_3144207.p',fact_193_surj__pair) ).
thf(fact_4_sound__FAll,axiom,
! [X11: nat,X12: prover1687215943e_form,X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ~ ( member_nat @ X11 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) )
=> ( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X5 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X12 @ X11 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
=> ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3i5YOFtziZ/E---3.1_3144207.p',fact_4_sound__FAll) ).
thf(conj_0,hypothesis,
~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3i5YOFtziZ/E---3.1_3144207.p',conj_0) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X870: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 )
| ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_2]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
! [X2219: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2219 )
<=> ! [X35: produc227817602le_U_o,X36: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ( prover1847600056is_env @ X35 @ X36 )
=> ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X35 @ X36 @ X2219 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_23_Svalid__def])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X870: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 )
| ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ X870 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
! [X3762: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X3763: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o,X3764: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X3762 @ X3763 ) @ X3764 )
| ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X3762 @ X3763 ) @ X3764 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_1])])]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
! [X3075: produc227817602le_U_o] :
( X3075
= ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ ( esk290_1 @ X3075 ) @ ( epred21_1 @ X3075 ) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_193_surj__pair])]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2279: list_P512754263e_form,X2280: produc227817602le_U_o,X2281: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U,X2282: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ( ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2279 )
| ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ X2280 @ X2281 )
| ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X2280 @ X2281 @ X2279 ) )
& ( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( esk2_1 @ X2282 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X2282 ) )
| ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2282 ) )
& ( ~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( esk2_1 @ X2282 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X2282 ) @ X2282 )
| ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X2282 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 )
& ~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
! [X11: nat,X12: prover1687215943e_form,X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ~ ( member_nat @ X11 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) )
=> ( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X5 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X12 @ X11 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
=> ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X12 ) @ X5 ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_4_sound__FAll]) ).
thf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
! [X392: nat > list_P796095576elle_U > $o,X391: set_Pr619177522elle_U,X4: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X391 @ X392 ) @ X4 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
| ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ X391 @ X392 ) @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
! [X3: produc227817602le_U_o] :
( X3
= ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ ( esk290_1 @ X3 ) @ ( epred21_1 @ X3 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
thf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(c_0_17,plain,
! [X3: produc227817602le_U_o,X5: list_P512754263e_form,X4: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X3 @ X4 @ X5 )
| ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 )
| ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
prover1847600056is_env @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X2240: nat,X2241: prover1687215943e_form,X2242: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ( member_nat @ X2240 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X2241 ) @ X2242 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X2242 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X2241 @ X2240 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
| ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X2241 ) @ X2242 ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 )
| ~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( esk2_1 @ X5 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X5 ) @ X5 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
! [X3: produc227817602le_U_o,X4: nat > prover_Mirabelle_U] :
( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ X3 @ X4 @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) )
| ~ ( prover1847600056is_env @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
thf(c_0_22,plain,
! [X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ( prover1847600056is_env @ ( esk2_1 @ X5 ) @ ( esk3_1 @ X5 ) )
| ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
thf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
! [X5: list_P512754263e_form] :
( ( prover1282070756_SEval @ ( produc1069574002le_U_o @ a @ b ) @ esk429_0 @ X5 )
| ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ X5 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
thf(c_0_26,plain,
! [X1: prover1687215943e_form,X5: list_P512754263e_form,X8: nat] :
( ( member_nat @ X8 @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X1 ) @ X5 ) ) ) )
| ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ X1 ) @ X5 ) )
| ~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ X5 @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ X1 @ X8 ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
thf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
prover1539709396Svalid @ ( append1038020460e_form @ s @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover1577896257_finst @ f @ u ) @ nil_Pr1384483009e_form ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
~ ( member_nat @ u @ ( set_nat2 @ ( prover_Mirabelle_sfv @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ ( prover1539709396Svalid @ ( cons_P1475164433e_form @ ( prover571163162e_FAll @ f ) @ s ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
thf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : ITP158^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:03:39 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.29 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3i5YOFtziZ/E---3.1_3144207.p
% 4.27/1.01 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 4.27/1.01 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 4.27/1.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting sh7 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting new_bool_12 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 3144227 completed with status 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 4.27/1.01 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 4.27/1.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.27/1.01 % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.27/1.01 % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN
% 4.27/1.01 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting lpo4_lambdas_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting full_lambda_10 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % full_lambda_10 with pid 3144237 completed with status 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Result found by full_lambda_10
% 4.27/1.01 % Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSSNHSA.
% 4.27/1.01 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.27/1.01 % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.27/1.01 % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-MHSFFSBN
% 4.27/1.01 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting lpo4_lambdas_fix with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting post_as_ho3 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Starting full_lambda_10 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.27/1.01 % Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 4.27/1.01 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.27/1.01
% 4.27/1.01 % Proof found!
% 4.27/1.01 % SZS status Theorem
% 4.27/1.01 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.27/1.01 % Parsed axioms : 505
% 4.27/1.01 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Initial clauses : 927
% 4.27/1.01 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 166
% 4.27/1.01 % Initial clauses in saturation : 761
% 4.27/1.01 % Processed clauses : 2317
% 4.27/1.01 % ...of these trivial : 42
% 4.27/1.01 % ...subsumed : 442
% 4.27/1.01 % ...remaining for further processing : 1833
% 4.27/1.01 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1391
% 4.27/1.01 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Backward-subsumed : 4
% 4.27/1.01 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 4.27/1.01 % Generated clauses : 14250
% 4.27/1.01 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12435
% 4.27/1.01 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 4.27/1.01 % Paramodulations : 12762
% 4.27/1.01 % Factorizations : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % NegExts : 12
% 4.27/1.01 % Equation resolutions : 1423
% 4.27/1.01 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Total rewrite steps : 1097
% 4.27/1.01 % ...of those cached : 769
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional check models : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.27/1.01 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.27/1.01 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.27/1.01 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.27/1.01 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.27/1.01 % Current number of processed clauses : 1053
% 4.27/1.01 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 125
% 4.27/1.01 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 4.27/1.01 % Negative unit clauses : 66
% 4.27/1.01 % Non-unit-clauses : 845
% 4.27/1.01 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11509
% 4.27/1.01 % ...number of literals in the above : 38989
% 4.27/1.01 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Current number of archived clauses : 662
% 4.27/1.01 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 90960
% 4.27/1.01 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 64326
% 4.27/1.01 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 224
% 4.27/1.01 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7882
% 4.27/1.01 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % BW rewrite match attempts : 15011
% 4.27/1.01 % BW rewrite match successes : 20
% 4.27/1.01 % Condensation attempts : 2317
% 4.27/1.01 % Condensation successes : 0
% 4.27/1.01 % Termbank termtop insertions : 734492
% 4.27/1.01 % Search garbage collected termcells : 21061
% 4.27/1.01
% 4.27/1.01 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.27/1.01 % User time : 0.579 s
% 4.27/1.01 % System time : 0.033 s
% 4.27/1.01 % Total time : 0.613 s
% 4.27/1.01 % Maximum resident set size: 8232 pages
% 4.27/1.01
% 4.27/1.01 % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.27/1.01 % User time : 2.653 s
% 4.27/1.01 % System time : 0.147 s
% 4.27/1.01 % Total time : 2.799 s
% 4.27/1.01 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 4.27/1.01 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------