%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : ITP167^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:04:34 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.00s 0.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.00s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 2 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 206 ( 1 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 29 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 505 ( 32 ~; 30 |; 9 &; 428 @)
% ( 3 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 10 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 3 usr)
% Number of type conns : 128 ( 128 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 8 usr; 4 con; 0-6 aty)
% Number of variables : 61 ( 4 ^; 57 !; 0 ?; 61 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
list_char: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort2,type,
int: $tType ).
thf(decl_sort3,type,
com: $tType ).
thf(decl_28,type,
skip: com ).
thf(decl_65,type,
relati1310524937decomp: ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > com > com > ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).
thf(decl_68,type,
relati2102071307_hoare: ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > com > com > ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_69,type,
relati775585786_valid: ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > com > com > ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > $o ).
thf(decl_89,type,
p: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).
thf(decl_90,type,
q: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).
thf(decl_91,type,
c: com ).
thf(decl_92,type,
c2: com ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
<=> ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
& ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rRZrIx3N5F/E---3.1_288094.p',conj_0) ).
thf(fact_1_completeness,axiom,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
=> ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rRZrIx3N5F/E---3.1_288094.p',fact_1_completeness) ).
thf(fact_2_ir__valid__decomp,axiom,
( relati775585786_valid
= ( ^ [X5: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X6: com,X7: com,X8: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ X5 @ X6 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X5 @ X6 @ X7 @ X8 ) )
& ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X5 @ X6 @ X7 @ X8 ) @ skip @ X7 @ X8 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rRZrIx3N5F/E---3.1_288094.p',fact_2_ir__valid__decomp) ).
thf(fact_0_soundness,axiom,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
=> ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rRZrIx3N5F/E---3.1_288094.p',fact_0_soundness) ).
thf(fact_9_ir__valid__decomp2,axiom,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X15: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ skip @ X15 )
& ( relati775585786_valid @ X15 @ skip @ X3 @ X4 ) )
=> ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rRZrIx3N5F/E---3.1_288094.p',fact_9_ir__valid__decomp2) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
<=> ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
& ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) )
& ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
& ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
| ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1421: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X1422: com,X1423: com,X1424: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1421 @ X1422 @ X1423 @ X1424 )
| ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1421 @ X1422 @ X1423 @ X1424 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_1_completeness])])]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
thf(c_0_10,plain,
! [X1394: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X1395: com,X1396: com,X1397: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1394 @ X1395 @ X1396 @ X1397 )
<=> ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1394 @ X1395 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1394 @ X1395 @ X1396 @ X1397 ) )
& ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1394 @ X1395 @ X1396 @ X1397 ) @ skip @ X1396 @ X1397 ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_ir__valid__decomp])]) ).
thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_12,plain,
! [X1598: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X1599: com,X1600: com,X1601: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1598 @ X1599 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1598 @ X1599 @ X1600 @ X1601 ) )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1598 @ X1599 @ X1600 @ X1601 ) )
& ( ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1598 @ X1599 @ X1600 @ X1601 ) @ skip @ X1600 @ X1601 )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1598 @ X1599 @ X1600 @ X1601 ) )
& ( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1598 @ X1599 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1598 @ X1599 @ X1600 @ X1601 ) )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1598 @ X1599 @ X1600 @ X1601 ) @ skip @ X1600 @ X1601 )
| ( relati775585786_valid @ X1598 @ X1599 @ X1600 @ X1601 ) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])]) ).
thf(c_0_13,plain,
! [X1417: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X1418: com,X1419: com,X1420: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1417 @ X1418 @ X1419 @ X1420 )
| ( relati775585786_valid @ X1417 @ X1418 @ X1419 @ X1420 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_0_soundness])])]) ).
thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_15,plain,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ skip @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_16,plain,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_19,plain,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
thf(c_0_20,plain,
! [X1515: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X1516: com,X1517: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X1518: com,X1519: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1515 @ X1516 @ skip @ X1517 )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1517 @ skip @ X1518 @ X1519 )
| ( relati775585786_valid @ X1515 @ X1516 @ X1518 @ X1519 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_9_ir__valid__decomp2])])]) ).
thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
| ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_16]) ).
thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
| ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_24,plain,
! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X5: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X5 )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ skip @ X4 )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X4 @ skip @ X3 @ X5 ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
| ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_23]) ).
thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
! [X2: com,X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
( ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ X2 @ X1 )
| ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_22]) ).
thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : ITP167^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.18 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.18 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.18 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.18 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.18 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.18 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.18 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:05:00 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.19 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.22 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.28 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rRZrIx3N5F/E---3.1_288094.p
% 3.00/0.76 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 3.00/0.76 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 3.00/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting full_lambda_1 with 1200s (4) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting additional_ho_7 with 600s (2) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting full_lambda_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting lpo8_s with 300s (1) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % additional_ho_7 with pid 288147 completed with status 0
% 3.00/0.76 % Result found by additional_ho_7
% 3.00/0.76 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 3.00/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting full_lambda_1 with 1200s (4) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting additional_ho_7 with 600s (2) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0))
% 3.00/0.76 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0)
% 3.00/0.76 % Search class: HGHSM-FSLF32-DHHFFSBN
% 3.00/0.76 % partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 3.00/0.76 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting additional_ho_7 with 61s (1) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % additional_ho_7 with pid 288159 completed with status 0
% 3.00/0.76 % Result found by additional_ho_7
% 3.00/0.76 % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 3.00/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting full_lambda_1 with 1200s (4) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting additional_ho_7 with 600s (2) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0))
% 3.00/0.76 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,4.0,,2,20000,1.0)
% 3.00/0.76 % Search class: HGHSM-FSLF32-DHHFFSBN
% 3.00/0.76 % partial match(2): HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 3.00/0.76 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Starting additional_ho_7 with 61s (1) cores
% 3.00/0.76 % Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 3.00/0.76
% 3.00/0.76 % Proof found!
% 3.00/0.76 % SZS status Theorem
% 3.00/0.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.00/0.77 % Parsed axioms : 439
% 3.00/0.77 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 291
% 3.00/0.77 % Initial clauses : 286
% 3.00/0.77 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 12
% 3.00/0.77 % Initial clauses in saturation : 274
% 3.00/0.77 % Processed clauses : 346
% 3.00/0.77 % ...of these trivial : 14
% 3.00/0.77 % ...subsumed : 47
% 3.00/0.77 % ...remaining for further processing : 285
% 3.00/0.77 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1911
% 3.00/0.77 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 3.00/0.77 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 3.00/0.77 % Generated clauses : 5536
% 3.00/0.77 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3515
% 3.00/0.77 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 3.00/0.77 % Paramodulations : 1087
% 3.00/0.77 % Factorizations : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % NegExts : 10
% 3.00/0.77 % Equation resolutions : 1933
% 3.00/0.77 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Total rewrite steps : 55
% 3.00/0.77 % ...of those cached : 25
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional check models : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 3.00/0.77 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 3.00/0.77 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 3.00/0.77 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 3.00/0.77 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 3.00/0.77 % Current number of processed clauses : 264
% 3.00/0.77 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 23
% 3.00/0.77 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 3.00/0.77 % Negative unit clauses : 18
% 3.00/0.77 % Non-unit-clauses : 221
% 3.00/0.77 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3439
% 3.00/0.77 % ...number of literals in the above : 27637
% 3.00/0.77 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Current number of archived clauses : 17
% 3.00/0.77 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18079
% 3.00/0.77 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7574
% 3.00/0.77 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 42
% 3.00/0.77 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 667
% 3.00/0.77 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % BW rewrite match attempts : 28
% 3.00/0.77 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 3.00/0.77 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Condensation successes : 0
% 3.00/0.77 % Termbank termtop insertions : 185779
% 3.00/0.77 % Search garbage collected termcells : 9947
% 3.00/0.77
% 3.00/0.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.00/0.77 % User time : 0.380 s
% 3.00/0.77 % System time : 0.023 s
% 3.00/0.77 % Total time : 0.403 s
% 3.00/0.77 % Maximum resident set size: 6036 pages
% 3.00/0.77
% 3.00/0.77 % -------------------------------------------------
% 3.00/0.77 % User time : 0.752 s
% 3.00/0.77 % System time : 0.045 s
% 3.00/0.77 % Total time : 0.797 s
% 3.00/0.77 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 3.00/0.77 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------