↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : ITP167^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:05:43 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.77s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  195 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   29 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  463 (  30   ~;  28   |;   7   &; 392   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   15 (  10 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   3 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :  120 ( 120   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   0   ^;  57   !;   0   ?;  57   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    list_char: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    int: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort3,type,
    com: $tType ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    skip: com ).

thf(decl_65,type,
    relati1310524937decomp: ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > com > com > ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).

thf(decl_68,type,
    relati2102071307_hoare: ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > com > com > ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_69,type,
    relati775585786_valid: ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > com > com > ( ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_89,type,
    p: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).

thf(decl_90,type,
    q: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o ).

thf(decl_91,type,
    c: com ).

thf(decl_92,type,
    c2: com ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
  <=> ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
      & ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gd58yzY5lj/E---3.1_1777041.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_1_completeness,axiom,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
     => ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gd58yzY5lj/E---3.1_1777041.p',fact_1_completeness) ).

thf(fact_8_ir__valid__decomp1,axiom,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
     => ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
        & ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ skip @ X3 @ X4 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gd58yzY5lj/E---3.1_1777041.p',fact_8_ir__valid__decomp1) ).

thf(fact_0_soundness,axiom,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
     => ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gd58yzY5lj/E---3.1_1777041.p',fact_0_soundness) ).

thf(fact_9_ir__valid__decomp2,axiom,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X15: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ skip @ X15 )
        & ( relati775585786_valid @ X15 @ skip @ X3 @ X4 ) )
     => ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gd58yzY5lj/E---3.1_1777041.p',fact_9_ir__valid__decomp2) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
    <=> ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
        & ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

thf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
      | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
      | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) )
    & ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
      | ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
    & ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
      | ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2047: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2048: com,X2049: com,X2050: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X2047 @ X2048 @ X2049 @ X2050 )
      | ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X2047 @ X2048 @ X2049 @ X2050 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_1_completeness])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q )
    | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
    | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
    | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
    | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2084: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2085: com,X2086: com,X2087: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X2084 @ X2085 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X2084 @ X2085 @ X2086 @ X2087 ) )
        | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X2084 @ X2085 @ X2086 @ X2087 ) )
      & ( ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X2084 @ X2085 @ X2086 @ X2087 ) @ skip @ X2086 @ X2087 )
        | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X2084 @ X2085 @ X2086 @ X2087 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_8_ir__valid__decomp1])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X2043: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2044: com,X2045: com,X2046: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X2043 @ X2044 @ X2045 @ X2046 )
      | ( relati775585786_valid @ X2043 @ X2044 @ X2045 @ X2046 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_0_soundness])])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
    | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
    | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) @ skip @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 )
      | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
    | ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
    | ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) )
      | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X2088: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2089: com,X2090: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2091: com,X2092: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X2088 @ X2089 @ skip @ X2090 )
      | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X2090 @ skip @ X2091 @ X2092 )
      | ( relati775585786_valid @ X2088 @ X2089 @ X2091 @ X2092 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_9_ir__valid__decomp2])])]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) )
    | ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( relati2102071307_hoare @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
    | ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X2: com,X3: com,X4: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o,X5: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X5 )
      | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X1 @ X2 @ skip @ X4 )
      | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ X4 @ skip @ X3 @ X5 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ skip @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q )
    | ( relati2102071307_hoare @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2: com,X1: ( list_char > int ) > ( list_char > int ) > $o] :
      ( ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ X2 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    relati775585786_valid @ ( relati1310524937decomp @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ) @ skip @ c2 @ q,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( relati775585786_valid @ p @ c @ c2 @ q ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : ITP167^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.17  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 20:04:52 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.17  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gd58yzY5lj/E---3.1_1777041.p
% 1.77/0.58  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 1.77/0.58  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 1.77/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting full_lambda_1 with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting additional_ho_7 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting full_lambda_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting lpo8_s with 300s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % full_lambda_1 with pid 1777054 completed with status 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Result found by full_lambda_1
% 1.77/0.58  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 1.77/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting full_lambda_1 with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.77/0.58  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.77/0.58  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHHFFSBN
% 1.77/0.58  % partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 1.77/0.58  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting full_lambda_1 with 121s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting sh4l with 172s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting pre_casc_4 with 163s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % full_lambda_1 with pid 1777063 completed with status 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Result found by full_lambda_1
% 1.77/0.58  % Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSLNHHA.
% 1.77/0.58  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting full_lambda_1 with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.77/0.58  % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.77/0.58  % Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHHFFSBN
% 1.77/0.58  % partial match(1): HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
% 1.77/0.58  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 4 cores with 1200 seconds (1200 total)
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 109s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Starting full_lambda_1 with 121s (1) cores
% 1.77/0.58  % Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 1.77/0.58  
% 1.77/0.58  % Proof found!
% 1.77/0.58  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.77/0.58  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.77/0.58  % Parsed axioms                        : 439
% 1.77/0.58  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Initial clauses                      : 634
% 1.77/0.58  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 106
% 1.77/0.58  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 528
% 1.77/0.58  % Processed clauses                    : 1048
% 1.77/0.58  % ...of these trivial                  : 40
% 1.77/0.58  % ...subsumed                          : 314
% 1.77/0.58  % ...remaining for further processing  : 694
% 1.77/0.58  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5021
% 1.77/0.58  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 1.77/0.58  % Backward-rewritten                   : 25
% 1.77/0.58  % Generated clauses                    : 13052
% 1.77/0.58  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7785
% 1.77/0.58  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 1.77/0.58  % Paramodulations                      : 3948
% 1.77/0.58  % Factorizations                       : 96
% 1.77/0.58  % NegExts                              : 34
% 1.77/0.58  % Equation resolutions                 : 5047
% 1.77/0.58  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Total rewrite steps                  : 990
% 1.77/0.58  % ...of those cached                   : 670
% 1.77/0.58  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.77/0.58  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.77/0.58  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.77/0.58  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.77/0.58  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.77/0.58  % Current number of processed clauses  : 597
% 1.77/0.58  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 151
% 1.77/0.58  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 1.77/0.58  %    Negative unit clauses             : 65
% 1.77/0.58  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 374
% 1.77/0.58  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7245
% 1.77/0.58  % ...number of literals in the above   : 40141
% 1.77/0.58  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Current number of archived clauses   : 47
% 1.77/0.58  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 40459
% 1.77/0.58  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20339
% 1.77/0.58  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 105
% 1.77/0.58  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14825
% 1.77/0.58  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 30
% 1.77/0.58  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 199
% 1.77/0.58  % BW rewrite match successes           : 70
% 1.77/0.58  % Condensation attempts                : 1048
% 1.77/0.58  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.77/0.58  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 397054
% 1.77/0.58  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 14072
% 1.77/0.58  
% 1.77/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.77/0.58  % User time                : 0.270 s
% 1.77/0.58  % System time              : 0.024 s
% 1.77/0.58  % Total time               : 0.294 s
% 1.77/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 7572 pages
% 1.77/0.58  
% 1.77/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.77/0.58  % User time                : 0.812 s
% 1.77/0.58  % System time              : 0.054 s
% 1.77/0.58  % Total time               : 0.867 s
% 1.77/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 1.77/0.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------